Examining the Moderating Effect of Organic Structure and Innovative Culture
on the Relationship between Social Capital and Knowledge Management
Processes at a Research & Development Organization
{"title":"Examining the Moderating Effect of Organic Structure and Innovative Culture\non the Relationship between Social Capital and Knowledge Management\nProcesses at a Research & Development Organization","authors":"M. Zahedi, Shayan Naghdi Khanachah","doi":"10.51550/nijbmr.54.65.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- In today’s heavy competitive environment, organizations have found that the knowledge is\nthe best tool for keeping up with competitors. In this regard, the role of employees, as knowledge holders and the\nmost important capital of organizations have been being taken into account more than before. Since the existence of\nsocial capital in organizations lead to improvement and development of knowledge management processes (KMP),\nexamining the level of social capital as an important dimension of intellectual capital and its role in KMP is the main\npurpose of this article. Design/methodology/approach- By reviewing the existing literature and using standardized\nquestionnaire, it was tried to examine the relationship between social capital and KMP through the moderating role\nof organic structure and innovative culture in the organization. After review of the existing literature in depth, we\ntook advantages of Nahapiet and Ghoshal Model for measuring social capital and in order to measure the KMP,\nBukowitz and Williams Model was used. The main hypothesis of this research was that there was a significant\nrelationship between KMP and social capital through moderating role of organic structure and innovative culture in\nthe organization. In order to test the hypothesis, using the test methods for correlation coefficients (Pearson and\nSpearman), a standardized questionnaire was designed and distributed among our target segment including faculty\nmembers, researchers and administrative staffs of university. Findings- The results showed that contrary to our\nexpectation, considering moderator variables, structure and culture does not have positive and significant effect on\nKMP in the level of the organic structure and innovative culture of social capital. It was revealed that considering\nthose two variables, social capital does have a significant and positive effect on KMP in the level of mechanical\nstructure and non-innovative culture. We also found that there was a considerable relationship between cognitive and\nrelational dimensions of social capital and KMP. Besides that, it was understood that there was a positive and\nsignificant relationship between each of organic structure and innovative culture’s variables and social capital and\nKMP’s variables. Research limitations/implications– Risks of method variance or response biases are likely as all\nData are drawn from employee surveys, and some selection bias as respondents could not be directly compared with\nnon-respondents. Originality/value – This study makes a significant contribution to the intangible assets literature\nby providing further evidence of the impact of culture and structure on intellectual capital.","PeriodicalId":253019,"journal":{"name":"Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51550/nijbmr.54.65.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose- In today’s heavy competitive environment, organizations have found that the knowledge is
the best tool for keeping up with competitors. In this regard, the role of employees, as knowledge holders and the
most important capital of organizations have been being taken into account more than before. Since the existence of
social capital in organizations lead to improvement and development of knowledge management processes (KMP),
examining the level of social capital as an important dimension of intellectual capital and its role in KMP is the main
purpose of this article. Design/methodology/approach- By reviewing the existing literature and using standardized
questionnaire, it was tried to examine the relationship between social capital and KMP through the moderating role
of organic structure and innovative culture in the organization. After review of the existing literature in depth, we
took advantages of Nahapiet and Ghoshal Model for measuring social capital and in order to measure the KMP,
Bukowitz and Williams Model was used. The main hypothesis of this research was that there was a significant
relationship between KMP and social capital through moderating role of organic structure and innovative culture in
the organization. In order to test the hypothesis, using the test methods for correlation coefficients (Pearson and
Spearman), a standardized questionnaire was designed and distributed among our target segment including faculty
members, researchers and administrative staffs of university. Findings- The results showed that contrary to our
expectation, considering moderator variables, structure and culture does not have positive and significant effect on
KMP in the level of the organic structure and innovative culture of social capital. It was revealed that considering
those two variables, social capital does have a significant and positive effect on KMP in the level of mechanical
structure and non-innovative culture. We also found that there was a considerable relationship between cognitive and
relational dimensions of social capital and KMP. Besides that, it was understood that there was a positive and
significant relationship between each of organic structure and innovative culture’s variables and social capital and
KMP’s variables. Research limitations/implications– Risks of method variance or response biases are likely as all
Data are drawn from employee surveys, and some selection bias as respondents could not be directly compared with
non-respondents. Originality/value – This study makes a significant contribution to the intangible assets literature
by providing further evidence of the impact of culture and structure on intellectual capital.
目的——在当今激烈的竞争环境中,组织已经发现知识是跟上竞争对手的最佳工具。在这方面,员工作为知识持有者和组织最重要的资本的作用比以前得到了更多的考虑。由于组织中社会资本的存在导致知识管理过程(KMP)的改进和发展,研究社会资本水平作为智力资本的一个重要维度及其在KMP中的作用是本文的主要目的。设计/方法/方法-通过回顾现有文献和使用标准化问卷,试图通过组织中的有机结构和创新文化的调节作用来检验社会资本和KMP之间的关系。在深入回顾现有文献后,我们采用了Nahapiet and Ghoshal模型来测量社会资本,并采用了Bukowitz and Williams模型来测量KMP。本研究的主要假设是,通过组织的有机结构和创新文化的调节作用,KMP与社会资本之间存在显著的关系。为了检验假设,使用相关系数检验方法(Pearson and spearman),我们设计了一份标准化的问卷,并在我们的目标人群中分发,包括大学的教职员工、研究人员和行政人员。研究发现-研究结果表明,与我们的预期相反,考虑到调节变量,结构和文化在社会资本的有机结构和创新文化水平上对kmp没有显著的正向影响。研究发现,考虑到这两个变量,社会资本在机械结构和非创新文化水平上确实对KMP有显著的正向影响。我们还发现,社会资本的认知维度和关系维度与KMP之间存在相当大的关系。此外,有机结构和创新文化各变量与社会资本和kmp各变量之间存在显著的正相关关系。研究局限性/影响-所有数据都来自员工调查,可能存在方法差异或反应偏差的风险,并且由于受访者无法直接与非受访者进行比较,因此存在一些选择偏差。原创性/价值——本研究通过提供文化和结构对智力资本影响的进一步证据,对无形资产文献做出了重大贡献。