Origins of Leningrad (St Petersburg) school of psychology of aging in works of B.G.Ananiev and M.D.Alexandrova

O. Strizhitskaya
{"title":"Origins of Leningrad (St Petersburg) school of psychology of aging in works of B.G.Ananiev and M.D.Alexandrova","authors":"O. Strizhitskaya","doi":"10.21638/spbu16.2022.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the origins and foundations of the Leningrad / Petersburg school of the psychology of aging. The historical perspective of the development of the ideas of the psychology of aging from the global trends that existed at the beginning of the 20th century is presented, the general prerequisites for the emergence of the Leningrad / Petersburg approach to understanding the aging process in general, as well as the basic principles of the Leningrad / Petersburg school of the psychology of aging that have arisen on their basis are shown. The world psychology of aging began with the deficit paradigm of aging, which accepts involutionary processes as the norm of ontogenesis. At the same time, developmental psychology did not perceive the aging period as a period of human development. B.G.Ananyev, having analyzed and systematized the existing data and views on human ontogenesis, put forward the idea of the integrity of human development and the continuity of processes. Based on these ideas, M. D.Alexandrova first empirically confirmed these ideas using the example of sensory-perceptual functions, and then expanded the area of her scientific interests to the human ability to work. These studies led her to the conviction that the aging period is a period with its own resources and potentials, the activation of which will depend not only on the current situation, but also on the previous period of development. She also demonstrated the ambiguity and variability of developmental periods. The work shows that the proposed ideas were not only advanced for their time, but in many ways were ahead of their time. It was shown that the main idea of the Leningrad / Petersburg school of psychology of aging can be characterized as a constructive — positive approach to understanding aging processes, focused on human potentials and resources. It was shown that the ideas suggested by B. G.Ananyev and M. D.Alexandrova, continue in the works of their students and followers, who share and develop these ideas.","PeriodicalId":388528,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the origins and foundations of the Leningrad / Petersburg school of the psychology of aging. The historical perspective of the development of the ideas of the psychology of aging from the global trends that existed at the beginning of the 20th century is presented, the general prerequisites for the emergence of the Leningrad / Petersburg approach to understanding the aging process in general, as well as the basic principles of the Leningrad / Petersburg school of the psychology of aging that have arisen on their basis are shown. The world psychology of aging began with the deficit paradigm of aging, which accepts involutionary processes as the norm of ontogenesis. At the same time, developmental psychology did not perceive the aging period as a period of human development. B.G.Ananyev, having analyzed and systematized the existing data and views on human ontogenesis, put forward the idea of the integrity of human development and the continuity of processes. Based on these ideas, M. D.Alexandrova first empirically confirmed these ideas using the example of sensory-perceptual functions, and then expanded the area of her scientific interests to the human ability to work. These studies led her to the conviction that the aging period is a period with its own resources and potentials, the activation of which will depend not only on the current situation, but also on the previous period of development. She also demonstrated the ambiguity and variability of developmental periods. The work shows that the proposed ideas were not only advanced for their time, but in many ways were ahead of their time. It was shown that the main idea of the Leningrad / Petersburg school of psychology of aging can be characterized as a constructive — positive approach to understanding aging processes, focused on human potentials and resources. It was shown that the ideas suggested by B. G.Ananyev and M. D.Alexandrova, continue in the works of their students and followers, who share and develop these ideas.
b.g.阿纳涅夫和m.d.亚历山德罗娃著作中关于衰老心理学的列宁格勒(圣彼得堡)学派的起源
本文探讨了衰老心理学列宁格勒/彼得堡学派的起源和基础。从20世纪初存在的全球趋势出发,介绍了老龄化心理学思想发展的历史视角,列宁格勒/彼得堡方法出现的一般先决条件,以及在此基础上产生的列宁格勒/彼得堡老龄化心理学学派的基本原则。世界衰老心理学始于衰老的缺陷范式,该范式接受进化过程作为个体发生的规范。与此同时,发展心理学并没有将衰老期视为人类发展的一个时期。阿纳尼耶夫分析和整理了现有的关于人类个体发生的资料和观点,提出了人类发展的完整性和过程的连续性的观点。基于这些观点,dr . alexandrova首先用感觉-知觉功能的例子实证地证实了这些观点,然后将她的科学兴趣领域扩展到人类的工作能力。这些研究使她坚信,老龄化时期是一个有自己的资源和潜力的时期,这些资源和潜力的激活不仅取决于当前的情况,也取决于之前的发展。她还证明了发育时期的模糊性和可变性。这项工作表明,提出的想法不仅在他们的时代是先进的,而且在许多方面都领先于他们的时代。结果表明,列宁格勒/彼得堡老龄化心理学学派的主要思想可以被描述为一种建设性的-积极的方法来理解衰老过程,关注人的潜力和资源。研究表明,B. G.Ananyev和M. D.Alexandrova提出的思想在他们的学生和追随者的作品中得到了延续,他们分享和发展了这些思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信