Mechanical Testing and Reliability Analysis for 3D Printed Cubic Lattices

N. Kulkarni, S. Ekwaro-Osire, P. Egan
{"title":"Mechanical Testing and Reliability Analysis for 3D Printed Cubic Lattices","authors":"N. Kulkarni, S. Ekwaro-Osire, P. Egan","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2020-23694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 3D printing has enabled new avenues to design and fabricate diverse structures for engineering applications, such as mechanically efficient lattices. Lattices are useful as implants for biological applications for supporting in vivo loads. However, inconsistencies in 3D printing motivates a need to quantify uncertainties contributing to mechanical failure using probabilistic analysis. Here, 50 cubic unit cell lattice samples were printed and tested with designs of 50% porosity, 500-micron beam diameters, and 3.5mm length, width, and height dimensions. The average length, width, and height measurements ranged from 3.47mm to 3.48mm. The precision in printing with a 95% confidence level was greater than 99.8%. Lattice elastic moduli ranged from about 270 MPa to 345 MPa, with a mean of 305 MPa. Probabilistic analyses were conducted with NESSUS software. The distributions of input parameters were determined using a chi-square test. The first-order reliability method was used to calculate the probability of failure and sensitivity of each input parameter. The elastic modulus was the most sensitive among all input parameters, with 57% of the total sensitivity. The study quantified printing inconsistencies and sensitives using empirical evidence and is a significant step forward for designing 3D printed parts for mechanical applications.","PeriodicalId":228519,"journal":{"name":"Volume 14: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 14: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-23694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

3D printing has enabled new avenues to design and fabricate diverse structures for engineering applications, such as mechanically efficient lattices. Lattices are useful as implants for biological applications for supporting in vivo loads. However, inconsistencies in 3D printing motivates a need to quantify uncertainties contributing to mechanical failure using probabilistic analysis. Here, 50 cubic unit cell lattice samples were printed and tested with designs of 50% porosity, 500-micron beam diameters, and 3.5mm length, width, and height dimensions. The average length, width, and height measurements ranged from 3.47mm to 3.48mm. The precision in printing with a 95% confidence level was greater than 99.8%. Lattice elastic moduli ranged from about 270 MPa to 345 MPa, with a mean of 305 MPa. Probabilistic analyses were conducted with NESSUS software. The distributions of input parameters were determined using a chi-square test. The first-order reliability method was used to calculate the probability of failure and sensitivity of each input parameter. The elastic modulus was the most sensitive among all input parameters, with 57% of the total sensitivity. The study quantified printing inconsistencies and sensitives using empirical evidence and is a significant step forward for designing 3D printed parts for mechanical applications.
3D打印立方格的力学测试与可靠性分析
3D打印为工程应用提供了设计和制造各种结构的新途径,例如机械高效的晶格。晶格作为植入物在生物应用中支持体内负荷是有用的。然而,3D打印中的不一致性促使人们需要使用概率分析来量化导致机械故障的不确定性。在这里,打印了50个立方单元晶格样品,并以50%的孔隙率,500微米的光束直径,3.5mm的长、宽、高尺寸进行了测试。平均长度、宽度和高度测量范围为3.47毫米至3.48毫米。在95%的置信水平上,印刷精度大于99.8%。晶格弹性模量约为270 ~ 345 MPa,平均值为305 MPa。采用NESSUS软件进行概率分析。输入参数的分布采用卡方检验确定。采用一阶可靠度法计算各输入参数的失效概率和灵敏度。弹性模量在所有输入参数中最敏感,占总灵敏度的57%。该研究使用经验证据量化了打印不一致性和敏感性,是设计机械应用3D打印部件的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信