Nepal’s Water Resources: Blessing or Curse ?

R. Shrestha
{"title":"Nepal’s Water Resources: Blessing or Curse ?","authors":"R. Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/HN.V19I0.15342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For half a century, Nepal has been chanting the ‘Mantra’ of 83,000 MW hydropower potential. When Nepal was in its childhood as a young democratic nation in the 1950s, India, with its vast ‘experience’ under the British colonial rule (colonial mindset), extracted lop-sided agreements on the Koshi, Gandaki and Mahakali rivers. Whereas India irrigates 12,200,000 acres of land, flood mitigates flood hazards and benefits from other intangible benefits. Nepal gets a meager 160,000 acres irrigation facility (1.3 percent of total irrigation benefits) from these unequivocal biased agreements. The adverse social and ecological impacts in Nepal are unaccounted for. Such water resource agreements have resulted in the sad present-day plight of Nepal: social life and industries are in total disarray with dismally low economic growth rates (GDP) forcing millions of Nepalese to seek employment abroad. Before it gets out of hand, India’s direct/indirect domination over Nepal’s water resources and politics should end, so that Nepal can develop its economy and hydropower in peace. Nepal should first develop run-of-river projects as per the modality of 456 MW Upper Tamakoshi Hydroelectric Project (cost 1000 US$/kWh) and medium size storage hydropower projects (140 MW Tanahu). Muddling with large storage projects like 1200 MW Budhi Gandaki HEP will only further delay the execution of RoR projects. NEA’s technical capability should be improved to build and oversee hydropower projects and INPS. HYDRO Nepal Journal Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Issue: 19 Page: 11- 15","PeriodicalId":117617,"journal":{"name":"Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/HN.V19I0.15342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For half a century, Nepal has been chanting the ‘Mantra’ of 83,000 MW hydropower potential. When Nepal was in its childhood as a young democratic nation in the 1950s, India, with its vast ‘experience’ under the British colonial rule (colonial mindset), extracted lop-sided agreements on the Koshi, Gandaki and Mahakali rivers. Whereas India irrigates 12,200,000 acres of land, flood mitigates flood hazards and benefits from other intangible benefits. Nepal gets a meager 160,000 acres irrigation facility (1.3 percent of total irrigation benefits) from these unequivocal biased agreements. The adverse social and ecological impacts in Nepal are unaccounted for. Such water resource agreements have resulted in the sad present-day plight of Nepal: social life and industries are in total disarray with dismally low economic growth rates (GDP) forcing millions of Nepalese to seek employment abroad. Before it gets out of hand, India’s direct/indirect domination over Nepal’s water resources and politics should end, so that Nepal can develop its economy and hydropower in peace. Nepal should first develop run-of-river projects as per the modality of 456 MW Upper Tamakoshi Hydroelectric Project (cost 1000 US$/kWh) and medium size storage hydropower projects (140 MW Tanahu). Muddling with large storage projects like 1200 MW Budhi Gandaki HEP will only further delay the execution of RoR projects. NEA’s technical capability should be improved to build and oversee hydropower projects and INPS. HYDRO Nepal Journal Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Issue: 19 Page: 11- 15
尼泊尔水资源:是福还是祸?
半个世纪以来,尼泊尔一直在念叨8.3万兆瓦水电潜力的“咒语”。当尼泊尔在20世纪50年代作为一个年轻的民主国家处于童年时期时,印度凭借其在英国殖民统治下的丰富“经验”(殖民心态),在科希河、甘达基河和马哈卡利河上达成了不平衡的协议。而印度灌溉了1220万英亩的土地,洪水减轻了洪水的危害,并带来了其他无形的好处。尼泊尔从这些毫无偏见的协议中获得了16万英亩的灌溉设施(占灌溉总收益的1.3%)。对尼泊尔不利的社会和生态影响尚不清楚。这种水资源协议导致了尼泊尔目前的悲惨困境:社会生活和工业完全混乱,经济增长率(GDP)低得令人沮丧,迫使数百万尼泊尔人到国外寻找工作。在事态失控之前,印度应该结束对尼泊尔水资源和政治的直接/间接统治,这样尼泊尔才能和平地发展经济和水电。尼泊尔应该首先按照456兆瓦的上塔玛克什水电项目(成本1000美元/千瓦时)和中型储能水电项目(140兆瓦塔纳胡)的模式开发顺流项目。像1200兆瓦Budhi Gandaki HEP这样的大型储能项目,只会进一步推迟RoR项目的执行。国家能源局的技术能力应该提高,以建设和监督水电项目和INPS。水电尼泊尔杂志水,能源和环境杂志发行:19页:11- 15
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信