Who's policing whom? A look into the policing responses to harmful practices and the role of civic society

Polly Harrar
{"title":"Who's policing whom? A look into the policing responses to harmful practices and the role of civic society","authors":"Polly Harrar","doi":"10.13169/JGLOBFAUL.8.1.0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Nations defines harmful practices as: ‘. . . persistent practices and behaviours grounded on discrimination on the basis of sex, gender and age and other grounds as well as multiple and/or intersecting forms of discrimination that often involve violence and cause physical and/or psychological harm or suffering’. They are commonly perceived to be based on tradition, culture, custom and practice, religion and/or superstition, and in certain communities and societies these practices have been established for so long that they are considered or perceived to be part of accepted cultural norms. Where they have gone unchallenged for multiple generations, they have become ‘normalised’, which often makes it difficult to make the distinction between cultural/traditional norms and enforced harmful and controlling behaviour. Examples of harmful practices include, but are not limited to, female genital mutilation, honour-based abuse, forced marriage, dowry violence and abuse linked to faith and belief, such as witchcraft, possessions and breast ironing – all of which are practiced and are prevalent in the UK today. The focus of this paper is honour based abuse (HBA), which is often applied as a precursor to other harmful practices and which lends itself to highlighting the intersectionality of this largely gendered practice. The role of affected communities is explored, as is how this can lead to a culture of self-policing. A panoptic framework is adopted before conclusions are drawn as to the future of policing in addressing these hidden harms. The aim of this paper is not to provide a comprehensive critical analysis of policing responses to an ever evolving and highly complex crime type, nor is it to present all BAME women and communities as a homogeneous group, but rather to further explore some of the key concepts that arose from discussions and which may go some way to understanding hidden harms that exist in relation to honour and shame.","PeriodicalId":167633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Faultlines","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Faultlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/JGLOBFAUL.8.1.0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The United Nations defines harmful practices as: ‘. . . persistent practices and behaviours grounded on discrimination on the basis of sex, gender and age and other grounds as well as multiple and/or intersecting forms of discrimination that often involve violence and cause physical and/or psychological harm or suffering’. They are commonly perceived to be based on tradition, culture, custom and practice, religion and/or superstition, and in certain communities and societies these practices have been established for so long that they are considered or perceived to be part of accepted cultural norms. Where they have gone unchallenged for multiple generations, they have become ‘normalised’, which often makes it difficult to make the distinction between cultural/traditional norms and enforced harmful and controlling behaviour. Examples of harmful practices include, but are not limited to, female genital mutilation, honour-based abuse, forced marriage, dowry violence and abuse linked to faith and belief, such as witchcraft, possessions and breast ironing – all of which are practiced and are prevalent in the UK today. The focus of this paper is honour based abuse (HBA), which is often applied as a precursor to other harmful practices and which lends itself to highlighting the intersectionality of this largely gendered practice. The role of affected communities is explored, as is how this can lead to a culture of self-policing. A panoptic framework is adopted before conclusions are drawn as to the future of policing in addressing these hidden harms. The aim of this paper is not to provide a comprehensive critical analysis of policing responses to an ever evolving and highly complex crime type, nor is it to present all BAME women and communities as a homogeneous group, but rather to further explore some of the key concepts that arose from discussions and which may go some way to understanding hidden harms that exist in relation to honour and shame.
谁在监管谁?调查警察对有害做法的反应和公民社会的作用
联合国对有害做法的定义是:“……基于性别、性别和年龄及其他理由的歧视以及多种和/或交叉形式的歧视的持续做法和行为,这些歧视往往涉及暴力并造成身体和/或心理伤害或痛苦。它们通常被认为是基于传统、文化、习俗和做法、宗教和/或迷信,在某些社区和社会中,这些做法已经确立了很长时间,因此它们被认为或被认为是可接受的文化规范的一部分。在几代人都没有受到挑战的地方,它们已经变得“正常化”,这往往使人们很难区分文化/传统规范和强制的有害和控制行为。有害习俗的例子包括,但不限于,切割女性生殖器,基于荣誉的虐待,强迫婚姻,嫁妆暴力和与信仰和信仰有关的虐待,如巫术,财产和熨胸-所有这些都是实践,并在今天的英国很普遍。本文的重点是基于荣誉的虐待(HBA),它经常被用作其他有害做法的先驱,并使其本身突出了这种主要性别化做法的交叉性。本书探讨了受影响社区的作用,以及这如何导致一种自我监管的文化。在得出解决这些潜在危害的警务未来的结论之前,采用了一个全面的框架。本文的目的不是对不断发展和高度复杂的犯罪类型的警务反应提供全面的批判性分析,也不是将所有BAME妇女和社区作为一个同质群体呈现,而是进一步探索从讨论中产生的一些关键概念,这些概念可能在某种程度上理解与荣誉和羞耻相关的隐藏危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信