Focusing on the Internal Environment in Discussion of the FCPA

Lauren M. Golick, Elizabeth A. Janko, Scott A. Yetmar
{"title":"Focusing on the Internal Environment in Discussion of the FCPA","authors":"Lauren M. Golick, Elizabeth A. Janko, Scott A. Yetmar","doi":"10.30845/ijbss.v9n11p2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 is a significant piece of American legislature that, especially in recent years, has been the subject of many heated debates in business discussions. As of February 23, 2017, this law has brought Department of Justice (DOJ) or Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) actions in 497 cases, collected $9,981,825,430 in total monetary sanctions imposed in all FCPA-related cases, and has ties to $4,279,568,195 in bribery payments (Stanford Law School FCPA Clearinghouse, 2017).Recent years, relevant to the era of transformation in the regulatory and legal framework within the macro-environment, the demand for preventative and proprietary measures to implement effective internal controls for business enterprises has significantly increased. The FCPA is one of the internationally focused regulations in which is of high concern and risk for companies to comply with as indicative by the set forth standards and penalties if failure to comply. The FCPA can be analyzed in major core areas; penalties, international and domestic whistleblower provisions, and the socioeconomic status of countries combined with ethical development. Such three major discussion areas play a substantial role in determining the overall past history, current state, and future effectiveness of the FCPA. The FCPA has proven effective over the years, but in order for it to remain relevant and at the forefront of anticorruption and fair reporting, it must be updated to include increased standards for internal controls and software monitoring systems for large multinationals. The past successes of the FCPA, the unique role it plays as the world’s first and foremost anti-corruption legislation, and the importance of the anti-corruption movement to human advancement in terms of improving the reliability of business financials; all contribute to the need for increased enforcement and continued modernization of the FCPA on the global front.","PeriodicalId":108255,"journal":{"name":"International journal of business and social science","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of business and social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v9n11p2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 is a significant piece of American legislature that, especially in recent years, has been the subject of many heated debates in business discussions. As of February 23, 2017, this law has brought Department of Justice (DOJ) or Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) actions in 497 cases, collected $9,981,825,430 in total monetary sanctions imposed in all FCPA-related cases, and has ties to $4,279,568,195 in bribery payments (Stanford Law School FCPA Clearinghouse, 2017).Recent years, relevant to the era of transformation in the regulatory and legal framework within the macro-environment, the demand for preventative and proprietary measures to implement effective internal controls for business enterprises has significantly increased. The FCPA is one of the internationally focused regulations in which is of high concern and risk for companies to comply with as indicative by the set forth standards and penalties if failure to comply. The FCPA can be analyzed in major core areas; penalties, international and domestic whistleblower provisions, and the socioeconomic status of countries combined with ethical development. Such three major discussion areas play a substantial role in determining the overall past history, current state, and future effectiveness of the FCPA. The FCPA has proven effective over the years, but in order for it to remain relevant and at the forefront of anticorruption and fair reporting, it must be updated to include increased standards for internal controls and software monitoring systems for large multinationals. The past successes of the FCPA, the unique role it plays as the world’s first and foremost anti-corruption legislation, and the importance of the anti-corruption movement to human advancement in terms of improving the reliability of business financials; all contribute to the need for increased enforcement and continued modernization of the FCPA on the global front.
《反海外腐败法》讨论聚焦内部环境
1977年的《反海外腐败法》(Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,简称FCPA)是美国的一项重要立法,特别是近年来,一直是商业讨论中许多激烈辩论的主题。截至2017年2月23日,该法已导致美国司法部(DOJ)或美国证券交易委员会(SEC)对497起案件采取行动,在所有与《反海外腐败法》相关的案件中征收了总计9,981,825,430美元的罚款,并与4,279,568,195美元的贿赂款项有关(斯坦福大学法学院《反海外腐败法》清算所,2017年)。近年来,随着宏观环境下监管和法律框架的转型时代的到来,对企业实施有效内部控制的预防性和专有措施的需求显著增加。《反海外腐败法》是国际上关注的法规之一,其规定的标准和不遵守的处罚表明,公司遵守该法规具有高度的关注和风险。《反海外腐败法》可以从主要核心领域进行分析;处罚,国际和国内举报人的规定,以及国家的社会经济地位与道德发展相结合。这三个主要讨论领域在确定《反海外腐败法》的总体历史、现状和未来有效性方面发挥着重要作用。多年来,《反海外腐败法》已被证明是有效的,但为了使其保持相关地位,并在反腐败和公平报告方面走在前列,必须对其进行更新,以提高大型跨国公司内部控制和软件监控系统的标准。《反海外腐败法》过去的成功,它作为世界上第一个也是最重要的反腐败立法所发挥的独特作用,以及反腐败运动在提高企业财务可靠性方面对人类进步的重要性;所有这些都有助于在全球范围内加强《反海外腐败法》的执法和持续现代化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信