{"title":"KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING","authors":"Wiva Rahmadona Fitri, Wedra Aprison, Isnaniah Isnaniah","doi":"10.15548/MEJ.V4I1.1173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the problem in class X SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi about the learning model that is applied has not made students actively support. Students have difficulty solving real problems and problem-solving One alternative that can be used is to apply the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model. The problem formulation is the problem solving the problem of students who follow the CPS learning model better about students who take conventional learning in class X IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi? The purpose of the study is the learning of problem-solving students who take the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model better than students who take conventional learning in class X IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi in the 2019/2020 Academic Year. This type of research is a pre-experimental research design with The Static Group Comparison Design. The population is class X science students of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. While the sample is students of class X IPA-7 as an experimental class and class X IPA-6 as a control class. The instrument used was a test of the ability to solve mathematical problems consisting of essay tests. The data analysis technique uses t test which is supported by Minitab software. The results of t arithmetic = 2.54 and t-table = 1.67 because t-count> t table means that H0 is rejected at the real level α = 0.05, and by using Minitab obtained P-value = 0.007 which means P-value < α with a significant level α = 0.05 H_0 is rejected and H_1 is accepted. The Model of Problem Solving Creative Learning (CPS) is more about solving mathematical problems of students who use Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning better than those who study in class X IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi 2019/2020 Academic Year.","PeriodicalId":231880,"journal":{"name":"Math Educa Journal","volume":"14 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Educa Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/MEJ.V4I1.1173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This study discusses the problem in class X SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi about the learning model that is applied has not made students actively support. Students have difficulty solving real problems and problem-solving One alternative that can be used is to apply the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model. The problem formulation is the problem solving the problem of students who follow the CPS learning model better about students who take conventional learning in class X IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi? The purpose of the study is the learning of problem-solving students who take the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model better than students who take conventional learning in class X IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi in the 2019/2020 Academic Year. This type of research is a pre-experimental research design with The Static Group Comparison Design. The population is class X science students of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi. While the sample is students of class X IPA-7 as an experimental class and class X IPA-6 as a control class. The instrument used was a test of the ability to solve mathematical problems consisting of essay tests. The data analysis technique uses t test which is supported by Minitab software. The results of t arithmetic = 2.54 and t-table = 1.67 because t-count> t table means that H0 is rejected at the real level α = 0.05, and by using Minitab obtained P-value = 0.007 which means P-value < α with a significant level α = 0.05 H_0 is rejected and H_1 is accepted. The Model of Problem Solving Creative Learning (CPS) is more about solving mathematical problems of students who use Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning better than those who study in class X IPA of SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi 2019/2020 Academic Year.
本研究探讨了在Bukittinggi X SMA Negeri 1班所采用的学习模式没有得到学生积极支持的问题。学生在解决实际问题和解决问题方面有困难,可以使用的一种替代方法是应用创造性问题解决(CPS)学习模式。问题的形成是更好地解决遵循CPS学习模式的学生的问题,还是在SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi的X IPA班采用传统学习的学生的问题?本研究的目的是在2019/2020学年,在SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi的X IPA班,学习创造性问题解决(CPS)学习模式的学生比传统学习模式的学生更好的解决问题的学生。这类研究是采用静态组比较设计的预实验研究设计。人口是SMA Negeri 1 Bukittinggi的X班理科学生。而样本为X IPA-7班作为实验班,X IPA-6班作为对照班的学生。所使用的工具是一种解决数学问题的能力测试,包括论文测试。数据分析技术采用t检验,由Minitab软件支持。t算术= 2.54,t表= 1.67,因为t-count> t表意味着H0在真实水平α = 0.05被拒绝,使用Minitab得到p值= 0.007,意味着p值< α,显著水平α = 0.05 H_0被拒绝,H_1被接受。解决问题的创造性学习模式(CPS)更多的是解决数学问题,使用创造性问题解决(CPS)学习的学生比在2019/2020学年的SMA Negeri 1班学习的学生更好。