Evidence-Based Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Keun-Hyang Kim
{"title":"Evidence-Based Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder","authors":"Keun-Hyang Kim","doi":"10.15842/KJCP.2017.36.4.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to review recent domestic and overseas studies pertaining to psychological therapies for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and to offer guidelines for evidence-based treatment for GAD. Despite its high rates of comorbidity with other mental disorders and its rising worldwide prevalence, GAD has been given relatively little research attention compared to other anxiety disorders. According to overseas studies, the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Applied Relaxation (AR), Psychodynamic Therapy (PDT), Meta-cognitive Therapy (MCT), Mindfulness-based Therapy (MBT), and Worry Exposure (WE) have been repeatedly verified, with strong and modest efficacy being ascribed to CBT and AR, respectively. It is difficult to definitively verify the efficacies of MBTs since most MBT studies have been open trials and preliminary studies. There has been little domestic research on the efficacy of psychotherapy for GAD, which makes it impossible to even set appropriate levels for evidence-based treatments. Instead, domestic studies are primarily focused on GAD-related factors such as IU in the general population. Thus, systematic RCTs in patients with GAD need to be conducted and accumulated before the criteria for national evidence-based treatments can be defined. In addition, Internet-based treatments and related applications, which promote an understanding of GAD and the accessibility of GAD treatments, are introduced. Finally, guidelines for evidence-based treatments of GAD based on recent research will be offered, and potentially beneficial points for future research on GAD and its treatments, as well as further implications of this study will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":115450,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15842/KJCP.2017.36.4.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review recent domestic and overseas studies pertaining to psychological therapies for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and to offer guidelines for evidence-based treatment for GAD. Despite its high rates of comorbidity with other mental disorders and its rising worldwide prevalence, GAD has been given relatively little research attention compared to other anxiety disorders. According to overseas studies, the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Applied Relaxation (AR), Psychodynamic Therapy (PDT), Meta-cognitive Therapy (MCT), Mindfulness-based Therapy (MBT), and Worry Exposure (WE) have been repeatedly verified, with strong and modest efficacy being ascribed to CBT and AR, respectively. It is difficult to definitively verify the efficacies of MBTs since most MBT studies have been open trials and preliminary studies. There has been little domestic research on the efficacy of psychotherapy for GAD, which makes it impossible to even set appropriate levels for evidence-based treatments. Instead, domestic studies are primarily focused on GAD-related factors such as IU in the general population. Thus, systematic RCTs in patients with GAD need to be conducted and accumulated before the criteria for national evidence-based treatments can be defined. In addition, Internet-based treatments and related applications, which promote an understanding of GAD and the accessibility of GAD treatments, are introduced. Finally, guidelines for evidence-based treatments of GAD based on recent research will be offered, and potentially beneficial points for future research on GAD and its treatments, as well as further implications of this study will be discussed.
广泛性焦虑障碍的循证治疗
本研究旨在综述国内外关于广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)心理治疗的最新研究,为广泛性焦虑障碍的循证治疗提供指导。尽管广泛性焦虑症与其他精神疾病的共病率很高,而且在世界范围内的患病率也在上升,但与其他焦虑症相比,广泛性焦虑症的研究关注相对较少。根据国外研究,认知行为疗法(CBT)、应用放松疗法(AR)、心理动力疗法(PDT)、元认知疗法(MCT)、正念疗法(MBT)和担忧暴露疗法(WE)的疗效已被反复验证,其中CBT和AR的疗效分别较强和一般。由于大多数MBT研究都是公开试验和初步研究,因此很难确定MBT的有效性。国内关于广泛性焦虑症心理治疗效果的研究很少,这使得甚至不可能为循证治疗设定适当的水平。相反,国内的研究主要集中在与gad相关的因素,如普通人群中的IU。因此,在确定国家循证治疗标准之前,需要对广泛性焦虑症患者进行系统的随机对照试验并进行积累。此外,还介绍了基于互联网的治疗和相关应用,这些应用促进了对广泛性焦虑症的理解和治疗的可及性。最后,本文将基于最新的研究为GAD的循证治疗提供指导,并对未来GAD及其治疗研究的潜在有益点以及本研究的进一步意义进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信