Effect of Replacing Soybean Concentrate with Bulgur (Wheat Groats) Flour on Quality and Storage Stability of Beef Burger

Burger, Nádia, A. Abd-El-Aziz, M. El-Razek, Faten, F. Abdel-Salam
{"title":"Effect of Replacing Soybean Concentrate with Bulgur (Wheat Groats) Flour on Quality and Storage Stability of Beef Burger","authors":"Burger, Nádia, A. Abd-El-Aziz, M. El-Razek, Faten, F. Abdel-Salam","doi":"10.21608/ajfs.2018.28616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Replacing soybean concentrate with Bulgur flour in beef burger manufacture was studied. The results showed that the components of Bulgur were carbohydrate (82.65 %), protein (13.47%), moisture (11.59%) and fat (1.8%). Dietary fiber content was 31.33 % NDF and 1.98% ADF. Water absorption, fat absorption and emulsion stability were 173.74%, 175.87% and 39/100g, respectively. Soybean concentrate had high level of isoflavones comparing with Bulgur flour. Genistein , biochanin A, daidzien and formononetin in soybean concentrate were higher 13, 6, 12 and 8 times than that in Bulgur flour. Percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity in Bulgur and soybean was 28.84% and 54.42%, respectively. Five different formulations of beef burger were prepared, 3 containing 10%, 15% and 20% Bulgur flour , one having 20% soybean concentrate and the last one was 100% meat .The moisture, protein, fat, ash and carbohydrate contents ranged from 66.37 to 72.72, 59.13 to 70.86, 21.48 to 24.34, 3.78 to 4.81 and 0. 17 to15.48%, respectively in the beef burger samples. Cooking loss and shrinkage increased after 3 months of freezing at –20°C, meanwhile decreasing in WHC was traced. The TBA values of the different burger products and after storage 3 months at –20°C ranged from 0.008 to 0.018 mg malonaldehyde per 1 kg sample. The TVC ranged from 3.5× 103 to 6.0 × 104 CFU/g before and after frozen storage. Enterobacteriaceae was 7.2x102 to 5.1x103 CFU/g in samples at zero time and not detected after one month of storage at –20°C. E.coli, Coliform and Staphylococcus aureus were not detected in all samples before and after 3 months of frozen storage . All roasted samples were judged acceptable by the panelists, 10% and 15% beef burger with Bulgur had the highest acceptability.","PeriodicalId":443317,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Journal of Food Science and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Journal of Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajfs.2018.28616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Replacing soybean concentrate with Bulgur flour in beef burger manufacture was studied. The results showed that the components of Bulgur were carbohydrate (82.65 %), protein (13.47%), moisture (11.59%) and fat (1.8%). Dietary fiber content was 31.33 % NDF and 1.98% ADF. Water absorption, fat absorption and emulsion stability were 173.74%, 175.87% and 39/100g, respectively. Soybean concentrate had high level of isoflavones comparing with Bulgur flour. Genistein , biochanin A, daidzien and formononetin in soybean concentrate were higher 13, 6, 12 and 8 times than that in Bulgur flour. Percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity in Bulgur and soybean was 28.84% and 54.42%, respectively. Five different formulations of beef burger were prepared, 3 containing 10%, 15% and 20% Bulgur flour , one having 20% soybean concentrate and the last one was 100% meat .The moisture, protein, fat, ash and carbohydrate contents ranged from 66.37 to 72.72, 59.13 to 70.86, 21.48 to 24.34, 3.78 to 4.81 and 0. 17 to15.48%, respectively in the beef burger samples. Cooking loss and shrinkage increased after 3 months of freezing at –20°C, meanwhile decreasing in WHC was traced. The TBA values of the different burger products and after storage 3 months at –20°C ranged from 0.008 to 0.018 mg malonaldehyde per 1 kg sample. The TVC ranged from 3.5× 103 to 6.0 × 104 CFU/g before and after frozen storage. Enterobacteriaceae was 7.2x102 to 5.1x103 CFU/g in samples at zero time and not detected after one month of storage at –20°C. E.coli, Coliform and Staphylococcus aureus were not detected in all samples before and after 3 months of frozen storage . All roasted samples were judged acceptable by the panelists, 10% and 15% beef burger with Bulgur had the highest acceptability.
用粗麦粉替代大豆精对牛肉汉堡品质及贮存稳定性的影响
研究了用粗粉代替大豆浓缩物生产牛肉汉堡。结果表明,冬瓜的主要成分为碳水化合物(82.65%)、蛋白质(13.47%)、水分(11.59%)和脂肪(1.8%)。日粮纤维含量为NDF的31.33%和ADF的1.98%。吸水率为173.74%,吸脂率为175.87%,乳化稳定性为39/100g。大豆浓缩物中异黄酮含量高于碾碎面粉。大豆浓缩物中的染料木素、生物茶素A、大豆素和刺芒柄花素含量分别是粗粉中的13倍、6倍、12倍和8倍。Bulgur和soybean对DPPH自由基的清除率分别为28.84%和54.42%。配制了5种不同配方的牛肉汉堡,其中3种配方含有10%、15%和20%的粗粉,1种配方含有20%的大豆精,最后一种配方为100%的肉,其水分、蛋白质、脂肪、灰分和碳水化合物含量分别为66.37 ~ 72.72、59.13 ~ 70.86、21.48 ~ 24.34、3.78 ~ 4.81和0。在牛肉汉堡样本中分别为17%到15.48%。在-20℃冷冻3个月后,蒸煮损失和收缩率增加,WHC下降。不同汉堡产品在-20°C下储存3个月后的TBA值为每1 kg样品0.008至0.018 mg丙二醛。冷冻前后TVC变化范围为3.5× 103 ~ 6.0 × 104 CFU/g。肠杆菌科细菌在0时为7.2 × 102 ~ 5.1 × 103 CFU/g,在-20℃下保存1个月后未检出。所有样品冷冻保存3个月前后均未检出大肠杆菌、大肠菌群和金黄色葡萄球菌。所有的烤样品都被小组成员认为是可以接受的,10%和15%的牛肉干牛肉汉堡的可接受性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信