The Association Between Risk Factors And Ultrasound-Based Grades Of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease In Type-2 Diabetes Patients

F. H. Jong, P. A. Mellow
{"title":"The Association Between Risk Factors And Ultrasound-Based Grades Of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease In Type-2 Diabetes Patients","authors":"F. H. Jong, P. A. Mellow","doi":"10.33508/JWM.V5I1.1998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become more common as the cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer. The liver disease is highly prevalent in people with type-2 diabetes. Indonesia is not spared from the global epidemic of type-2 diabetes. The ultrasound examination is clinically easy-to-use, economical and non-invasive as a tool to detect NAFLD, compared to the gold standard, liver biopsy. To date, there has been no study in Indonesia to link risk factors and ultrasound-based severity grading of NAFLD. Aim: To understand the association between risk factors and ultrasound-based grades of NAFLD in patients with type-2 diabetes. Method: The present study was an observational study with a cross-sectional design (May-October 2018) that involved 82 type-2 diabetes outpatients of the internal medicine clinic in the Gotong Royong Hospital (Surabaya, Indonesia). The risk factors assessed were gender, age, diabetes duration, obesity (anthropometric measurement: body mass index/ BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio), glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c/ HbA1c level) and dyslipidemia (lipid profile: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein/ LDL, high-density lipoprotein/ HDL and triglyceride). The ultrasound-based grades of NAFLD consisted of grade 0 (no NAFLD), grade 1 (increased liver echogenicity with normal images of intrahepatic vessel lines and diaphragm), grade 2 (blurred image of intrahepatic vessel lines) and grade 3 (blurred images of intrahepatic vessel lines and diaphragm). Statistical p-value was significant at ≤ 0.05. Results: Seventy-eight subjects (95,1%) had NAFLD. The ultrasound-based NAFLD grades were significantly different across age groups (Kruskal-Wallis) but the Spearman’s rank correlation test result was not significant. Body mass index and total cholesterol were positively correlated (r = 0.390 and 0.237, respectively) with the NAFLD grades. Conclusion: Higher BMI and total cholesterol are associated with increased ultrasound-based NAFLD grades.","PeriodicalId":128539,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Widya Medika","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Widya Medika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33508/JWM.V5I1.1998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become more common as the cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer. The liver disease is highly prevalent in people with type-2 diabetes. Indonesia is not spared from the global epidemic of type-2 diabetes. The ultrasound examination is clinically easy-to-use, economical and non-invasive as a tool to detect NAFLD, compared to the gold standard, liver biopsy. To date, there has been no study in Indonesia to link risk factors and ultrasound-based severity grading of NAFLD. Aim: To understand the association between risk factors and ultrasound-based grades of NAFLD in patients with type-2 diabetes. Method: The present study was an observational study with a cross-sectional design (May-October 2018) that involved 82 type-2 diabetes outpatients of the internal medicine clinic in the Gotong Royong Hospital (Surabaya, Indonesia). The risk factors assessed were gender, age, diabetes duration, obesity (anthropometric measurement: body mass index/ BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio), glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c/ HbA1c level) and dyslipidemia (lipid profile: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein/ LDL, high-density lipoprotein/ HDL and triglyceride). The ultrasound-based grades of NAFLD consisted of grade 0 (no NAFLD), grade 1 (increased liver echogenicity with normal images of intrahepatic vessel lines and diaphragm), grade 2 (blurred image of intrahepatic vessel lines) and grade 3 (blurred images of intrahepatic vessel lines and diaphragm). Statistical p-value was significant at ≤ 0.05. Results: Seventy-eight subjects (95,1%) had NAFLD. The ultrasound-based NAFLD grades were significantly different across age groups (Kruskal-Wallis) but the Spearman’s rank correlation test result was not significant. Body mass index and total cholesterol were positively correlated (r = 0.390 and 0.237, respectively) with the NAFLD grades. Conclusion: Higher BMI and total cholesterol are associated with increased ultrasound-based NAFLD grades.
危险因素与2型糖尿病患者非酒精性脂肪肝超声分级之间的关系
背景:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)已成为肝硬化和肝癌的常见病因。这种肝脏疾病在2型糖尿病患者中非常普遍。印度尼西亚也未能幸免于全球流行的2型糖尿病。与金标准肝活检相比,超声检查在临床上易于使用,经济且无创,是一种检测NAFLD的工具。迄今为止,印度尼西亚还没有研究将危险因素与NAFLD的超声严重程度分级联系起来。目的:了解2型糖尿病患者NAFLD超声分级与危险因素的关系。方法:本研究是一项横断面设计的观察性研究(2018年5月- 10月),纳入印度尼西亚泗水Gotong Royong医院内科门诊的82例2型糖尿病患者。评估的危险因素包括性别、年龄、糖尿病病程、肥胖(人体测量:体重指数/ BMI、腰围和腰臀比)、血糖控制(血红蛋白A1c/ HbA1c水平)和血脂异常(脂质谱:总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白/ LDL、高密度脂蛋白/ HDL和甘油三酯)。NAFLD的超声分级分为0级(无NAFLD)、1级(肝脏回声增强,肝内血管线和膈影正常)、2级(肝内血管线模糊)和3级(肝内血管线和膈影模糊)。p值≤0.05有统计学意义。结果:78名受试者(95.5%)患有NAFLD。超声诊断的NAFLD分级在不同年龄组间差异有统计学意义(Kruskal-Wallis),但Spearman等级相关检验结果无统计学意义。体重指数和总胆固醇与NAFLD分级呈正相关(r分别为0.390和0.237)。结论:较高的BMI和总胆固醇与基于超声的NAFLD分级增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信