An open commit protocol preserving consistency in the presence of commission failures

K. Rothermel
{"title":"An open commit protocol preserving consistency in the presence of commission failures","authors":"K. Rothermel","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.1993.287711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the proposed commit protocols assume that all participants of a transaction are sane, i.e., they only fail with omission failures and eventually recover. Unfortunately, this assumption is not realistic for open distributed systems (ODSs), which can be divided into a trusted and a nontrusted domain. While nodes in the trusted domain are assumed to be sane, nontrusted nodes may fail permanently and with commission failures. The open commit protocols presented are based on a model for consistency checking. The protocol also tolerates any number of commission failures in the nontrusted domain of an ODS. It guarantees that the trusted participants of a transaction terminate in a way that preserves consistency in the trusted domain, which generally does not mean that all trusted participants have to terminate consistently. The protocol groups those trusted participants that have to terminate consistently to maintain data consistency, and ensures that in each group the participants terminate in the same way. The advantages of the protocol are a simplified commit processing and a reduced message complexity. The message complexity of this protocol exceeds that of traditional two-phase commit protocols by no more than two messages for most practical cases.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":249060,"journal":{"name":"[1993] Proceedings. The 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1993] Proceedings. The 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.1993.287711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Most of the proposed commit protocols assume that all participants of a transaction are sane, i.e., they only fail with omission failures and eventually recover. Unfortunately, this assumption is not realistic for open distributed systems (ODSs), which can be divided into a trusted and a nontrusted domain. While nodes in the trusted domain are assumed to be sane, nontrusted nodes may fail permanently and with commission failures. The open commit protocols presented are based on a model for consistency checking. The protocol also tolerates any number of commission failures in the nontrusted domain of an ODS. It guarantees that the trusted participants of a transaction terminate in a way that preserves consistency in the trusted domain, which generally does not mean that all trusted participants have to terminate consistently. The protocol groups those trusted participants that have to terminate consistently to maintain data consistency, and ensures that in each group the participants terminate in the same way. The advantages of the protocol are a simplified commit processing and a reduced message complexity. The message complexity of this protocol exceeds that of traditional two-phase commit protocols by no more than two messages for most practical cases.<>
一个开放的提交协议在提交失败的情况下保持一致性
大多数提议的提交协议都假设事务的所有参与者都是正常的,也就是说,它们只会因遗漏失败而失败,并最终恢复。不幸的是,这个假设对于开放分布式系统(ODSs)来说是不现实的,因为开放分布式系统可以分为可信域和非可信域。虽然假设可信域中的节点是正常的,但不可信的节点可能会永久失败并出现委托失败。提出的开放提交协议是基于一致性检查模型的。该协议还允许ODS的非可信域中出现任意数量的委托失败。它保证事务的可信参与者以保持可信域中一致性的方式终止,这通常并不意味着所有可信参与者都必须一致地终止。该协议将那些必须一致终止以保持数据一致性的受信任参与者分组,并确保每个组中的参与者以相同的方式终止。该协议的优点是简化了提交处理和降低了消息复杂性。在大多数实际情况下,该协议的消息复杂度比传统的两阶段提交协议多不超过两条消息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信