Employment effects for people with disabilities after participation in vocational training programmes: A cohort analysis using propensity score matching

N. Reims, A. Tisch
{"title":"Employment effects for people with disabilities after participation in vocational training programmes: A cohort analysis using propensity score matching","authors":"N. Reims, A. Tisch","doi":"10.3233/WOR-205046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Vocational rehabilitation (VR) aims to help people with disabilities to return to the labour market. Though, there is not much evidence on its effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: We explore the effect of vocational training programmes in VR and the VR status itself on employment outcomes. METHODS: Using two samples from administrative data by the German Federal Employment Agency, we applied propensity score matching. We followed rehabilitants commencing VR in 2009/2010 (N = 7,905) for four years (comparison I) and general training participants with and without VR status completing training in 2012/2013 (N = 21,020) for one year (comparison II). For harmonisation purposes, we only considered individuals aged between 25 and 40 and excluded those in employment at the beginning of VR or training. RESULTS: Concerning the effect of training in VR (comparison I), we observe a lock-in effect during training (p < 0.001) due to an involvement in VR; after training, participants are more likely to obtain unsubsidised employment (0.05, p < 0.05) than non-participants, but there is no statistically significant income difference after four years. Regarding the effect of the VR status (comparison II), rehabilitants are more likely to take up (un-)subsidised employment (0.04, p < 0.01; 0.02, p < 0.001) after training, exhibit longer employment durations (19 days, p < 0.001) and achieve higher average incomes (2,414 euro/year, p < 0.001) compared to non-rehabilitants. CONCLUSIONS: Training participation helps to improve employment participation of rehabilitants. However, a longer observation period is recommended. Furthermore, the VR status itself leads to more sustainable and better-paid employment. This is due to more comprehensive support and longer-term subsidised employment opportunities.","PeriodicalId":319034,"journal":{"name":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vocational rehabilitation (VR) aims to help people with disabilities to return to the labour market. Though, there is not much evidence on its effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: We explore the effect of vocational training programmes in VR and the VR status itself on employment outcomes. METHODS: Using two samples from administrative data by the German Federal Employment Agency, we applied propensity score matching. We followed rehabilitants commencing VR in 2009/2010 (N = 7,905) for four years (comparison I) and general training participants with and without VR status completing training in 2012/2013 (N = 21,020) for one year (comparison II). For harmonisation purposes, we only considered individuals aged between 25 and 40 and excluded those in employment at the beginning of VR or training. RESULTS: Concerning the effect of training in VR (comparison I), we observe a lock-in effect during training (p < 0.001) due to an involvement in VR; after training, participants are more likely to obtain unsubsidised employment (0.05, p < 0.05) than non-participants, but there is no statistically significant income difference after four years. Regarding the effect of the VR status (comparison II), rehabilitants are more likely to take up (un-)subsidised employment (0.04, p < 0.01; 0.02, p < 0.001) after training, exhibit longer employment durations (19 days, p < 0.001) and achieve higher average incomes (2,414 euro/year, p < 0.001) compared to non-rehabilitants. CONCLUSIONS: Training participation helps to improve employment participation of rehabilitants. However, a longer observation period is recommended. Furthermore, the VR status itself leads to more sustainable and better-paid employment. This is due to more comprehensive support and longer-term subsidised employment opportunities.
残障人士参加职业训练计划后的就业效应:使用倾向得分匹配的群组分析
背景:职业康复旨在帮助残疾人重返劳动力市场。然而,没有太多证据表明它的有效性。目的:探讨虚拟现实职业培训计划和虚拟现实本身对就业结果的影响。方法:采用德国联邦就业局行政数据中的两个样本,应用倾向得分匹配。我们对2009/2010年开始VR的康复者(N = 7905)进行了为期四年的随访(比较1),对2012/2013年完成或未完成VR状态的普通培训参与者(N = 21,020)进行了为期一年的随访(比较2)。为了协调起见,我们只考虑了年龄在25至40岁之间的个体,排除了在VR或培训开始时就业的个体。结果:关于虚拟现实训练的效果(比较1),我们观察到在训练期间由于参与虚拟现实而产生锁定效应(p < 0.001);培训后,参与者比非参与者更有可能获得无补贴就业(0.05,p < 0.05),但四年后收入差异无统计学意义。至于复康身分的影响(比较二),复康人士更有可能从事(非)资助就业(0.04,p < 0.01;0.02, p < 0.001),与非康复者相比,表现出更长的就业持续时间(19天,p < 0.001)和更高的平均收入(2,414欧元/年,p < 0.001)。结论:参与培训有助于提高康复人员的就业参与。但建议延长观察时间。此外,虚拟现实地位本身也会带来更可持续、收入更高的就业。这是由于更全面的支持和更长期的补贴就业机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信