Attributes of Formalisation Risk Culture and Its Typification in the Enterprise

I. Fedulova, I. Makarchuk, Viktoriia Hanushevych
{"title":"Attributes of Formalisation Risk Culture and Its Typification in the Enterprise","authors":"I. Fedulova, I. Makarchuk, Viktoriia Hanushevych","doi":"10.52566/msu-econ.9(2).2022.18-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forming a risk management culture requires an understanding of the attributes of formalising a risk culture and defining its type depending on the efficiency of its certain parameters. The purpose of the study is to systematise the attributes of formalisation of risk culture and identify the type of risk culture in the enterprise. To achieve the objectives, the attributes of formalising the risk culture in the enterprise were analysed and synthesised, defining their characteristics and definition parameters. To identify the type of risk culture at the enterprise, a matrix approach was used, according to which the type of risk culture was described in two parameters: “methods and control” and “level of personnel engagement”. Each of these parameters is considered according to two qualitative levels of impact. The “methods and controls” parameter is considered in terms of the existence of hard and soft risk management controls in the enterprise. The level of “personnel engagement” parameter can be either high or low and it indicates the level of staff motivation and support of the employees by supervisors on risk management. As a result of the formalisation, four types of company risk culture were identified, characterising the behavioural patterns and motivational factors of company employees, depending on the efficiency of regulations, the understanding of risks by personnel and risk management techniques. The practical value of the findings is that each employee will understand their role and responsibilities regarding their participation in the company’s risk management system, and managers will be able to assess the level of alignment of all employees in terms of using risk management practices and determine the best management styles and practices","PeriodicalId":331060,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series «Economics»","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series «Economics»","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ.9(2).2022.18-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forming a risk management culture requires an understanding of the attributes of formalising a risk culture and defining its type depending on the efficiency of its certain parameters. The purpose of the study is to systematise the attributes of formalisation of risk culture and identify the type of risk culture in the enterprise. To achieve the objectives, the attributes of formalising the risk culture in the enterprise were analysed and synthesised, defining their characteristics and definition parameters. To identify the type of risk culture at the enterprise, a matrix approach was used, according to which the type of risk culture was described in two parameters: “methods and control” and “level of personnel engagement”. Each of these parameters is considered according to two qualitative levels of impact. The “methods and controls” parameter is considered in terms of the existence of hard and soft risk management controls in the enterprise. The level of “personnel engagement” parameter can be either high or low and it indicates the level of staff motivation and support of the employees by supervisors on risk management. As a result of the formalisation, four types of company risk culture were identified, characterising the behavioural patterns and motivational factors of company employees, depending on the efficiency of regulations, the understanding of risks by personnel and risk management techniques. The practical value of the findings is that each employee will understand their role and responsibilities regarding their participation in the company’s risk management system, and managers will be able to assess the level of alignment of all employees in terms of using risk management practices and determine the best management styles and practices
企业正规化风险文化的属性及其类型化
形成风险管理文化需要理解将风险文化形式化的属性,并根据其某些参数的效率来定义其类型。本研究的目的是将风险文化形式化的属性系统化,并识别企业风险文化的类型。为了实现这一目标,分析和综合了企业风险文化形式化的属性,定义了它们的特征和定义参数。为了确定企业的风险文化类型,采用了矩阵法,根据矩阵法,风险文化的类型用两个参数来描述:“方法和控制”和“人员敬业程度”。这些参数中的每一个都是根据影响的两个定性水平来考虑的。“方法和控制”参数是根据企业中存在的硬和软风险管理控制来考虑的。“人员敬业度”参数的水平可高可低,它反映了员工的激励程度和主管对员工风险管理的支持程度。作为正规化的结果,确定了四种类型的公司风险文化,根据法规的效率、人员对风险的理解和风险管理技术,描述了公司员工的行为模式和动机因素。调查结果的实际价值在于,每个员工都将了解他们在公司风险管理系统中的角色和责任,管理人员将能够评估所有员工在使用风险管理实践方面的一致性水平,并确定最佳的管理风格和实践
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信