Performance Analysis of WMN-GA System for Different WMN Architectures and TCP Congestion-Avoidance Algorithms

I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Admir Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa
{"title":"Performance Analysis of WMN-GA System for Different WMN Architectures and TCP Congestion-Avoidance Algorithms","authors":"I. Shinko, Tetsuya Oda, Admir Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, L. Barolli, F. Xhafa","doi":"10.1109/CISIS.2016.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter, fairness index, queue and remaining energy metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3, Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Tahoe, Reno and NewReno for normal distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that for both WMN architectures, the PDR values of TCP congestion-avoidance algorithms are almost the same. For I/B WMN architecture, the throughput of TCP congestionavoidance algorithms is almost the same. However, for Hybrid WMN, the throughput of TCP NewReno is higher than other algorithms. The delay and jitter of I/B WMN are lower compared with Hybrid WMN. The fairness index of Hybrid WMN is higher than I/B WMN. For both WMN architectures, the queue size is almost the same. For both WMN architectures, the energy decreases sharply, but for TCP Reno the remaining energy of Hybrid WMN is higher than I/B WMN.","PeriodicalId":249236,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2016.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) architectures considering throughput, delay, jitter, fairness index, queue and remaining energy metrics. For simulations, we used ns-3, Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR). We compare the performance for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Tahoe, Reno and NewReno for normal distribution of mesh clients by sending multiple Constant Bit Rate (CBR) flows in the network. The simulation results show that for both WMN architectures, the PDR values of TCP congestion-avoidance algorithms are almost the same. For I/B WMN architecture, the throughput of TCP congestionavoidance algorithms is almost the same. However, for Hybrid WMN, the throughput of TCP NewReno is higher than other algorithms. The delay and jitter of I/B WMN are lower compared with Hybrid WMN. The fairness index of Hybrid WMN is higher than I/B WMN. For both WMN architectures, the queue size is almost the same. For both WMN architectures, the energy decreases sharply, but for TCP Reno the remaining energy of Hybrid WMN is higher than I/B WMN.
不同WMN结构和TCP拥塞避免算法下WMN- ga系统性能分析
在本文中,我们评估了两种无线网状网络(WMNs)体系结构的性能,考虑吞吐量,延迟,抖动,公平性指数,队列和剩余能量指标。为了进行仿真,我们使用了ns-3、分布式协调函数(DCF)和优化链路状态路由(OLSR)。通过在网络中发送多个恒定比特率(CBR)流,比较了传输控制协议(TCP) Tahoe、Reno和NewReno在网格客户端正态分布下的性能。仿真结果表明,在两种WMN体系结构下,TCP拥塞避免算法的PDR值基本相同。对于I/B WMN架构,TCP拥塞避免算法的吞吐量几乎相同。但是,对于Hybrid WMN, TCP NewReno的吞吐量高于其他算法。与混合WMN相比,I/B WMN具有较低的时延和抖动。混合WMN的公平性指数高于I/B WMN。对于两种WMN体系结构,队列大小几乎相同。对于两种WMN架构,能量都急剧下降,但对于TCP Reno, Hybrid WMN的剩余能量高于I/B WMN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信