Measuring the Value of Communication

P. Argenti
{"title":"Measuring the Value of Communication","authors":"P. Argenti","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.880782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past several years, determining the effectiveness of communications activities has become increasingly important both to communications professionals and to the greater business community. In 2004, the Communications Executive Council (CEC) conducted a survey of hundreds of chief communication officers in major corporations; 79 percent of the respondents stated they believed communication performance measurement was more important than it had been three years earlier. Survey respondents also ranked Measuring and Communicating Effectiveness of the Function as the second most important issue facing the communications industry. Not everyone in the communications industry views measurement in the same light, though. While some embrace the science of measurement as it relates to communications, others look at communications as an art outside the realm of formal measurement. Quotations from two corporate communications professionals illustrate this dichotomy: You can't manage what you can't measure. Everyone's looking for a seat at the table, and they ought to be looking at measurement for getting to the table and staying there. Bill Margaritis, SVP Worldwide Communications and IR, Fed Ex I cringe at the idea of return on investment because that sounds like what we do ought to be so predictable when it's not. Bill Nielsen, former Corporate VP of Public Affairs, Johnson & Johnson Despite the naysayers, however, most communications professionals are increasingly recognizing the truth in Margartis' words; without data on the effectiveness of their activities, communications professionals cannot gain the credibility they desire from senior management. In this article, we examine the importance of measurement to the communications industry, the insufficiency of measurement in communications, how communications professionals' measurement needs are changing, obstacles to meeting measurement needs, and the potential benefits from understanding the link between communications and business value, and, a new possible solution. This discussion is essential to understanding that the communications industry needs a way to add meaning to the data it already has; to link existing data to business outcomes; and to demonstrate that effective communications activities move organizations toward their business objectives. In many cases, companies do not require more or better measurement, only better use of existing measurement data. And once the communications industry has the ability to understand how its activities affect business outcomes, communications professionals can have a greater effect on business outcomes going forward rather than simply justifying what they have done in the past. To that end, we also discuss what we believe are the keys to measuring the contribution of communications activities.","PeriodicalId":172039,"journal":{"name":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.880782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past several years, determining the effectiveness of communications activities has become increasingly important both to communications professionals and to the greater business community. In 2004, the Communications Executive Council (CEC) conducted a survey of hundreds of chief communication officers in major corporations; 79 percent of the respondents stated they believed communication performance measurement was more important than it had been three years earlier. Survey respondents also ranked Measuring and Communicating Effectiveness of the Function as the second most important issue facing the communications industry. Not everyone in the communications industry views measurement in the same light, though. While some embrace the science of measurement as it relates to communications, others look at communications as an art outside the realm of formal measurement. Quotations from two corporate communications professionals illustrate this dichotomy: You can't manage what you can't measure. Everyone's looking for a seat at the table, and they ought to be looking at measurement for getting to the table and staying there. Bill Margaritis, SVP Worldwide Communications and IR, Fed Ex I cringe at the idea of return on investment because that sounds like what we do ought to be so predictable when it's not. Bill Nielsen, former Corporate VP of Public Affairs, Johnson & Johnson Despite the naysayers, however, most communications professionals are increasingly recognizing the truth in Margartis' words; without data on the effectiveness of their activities, communications professionals cannot gain the credibility they desire from senior management. In this article, we examine the importance of measurement to the communications industry, the insufficiency of measurement in communications, how communications professionals' measurement needs are changing, obstacles to meeting measurement needs, and the potential benefits from understanding the link between communications and business value, and, a new possible solution. This discussion is essential to understanding that the communications industry needs a way to add meaning to the data it already has; to link existing data to business outcomes; and to demonstrate that effective communications activities move organizations toward their business objectives. In many cases, companies do not require more or better measurement, only better use of existing measurement data. And once the communications industry has the ability to understand how its activities affect business outcomes, communications professionals can have a greater effect on business outcomes going forward rather than simply justifying what they have done in the past. To that end, we also discuss what we believe are the keys to measuring the contribution of communications activities.
衡量沟通的价值
在过去几年中,确定传播活动的有效性对传播专业人员和更大的商业社区都变得越来越重要。2004年,通讯行政会议对各大公司的数百名首席通讯主任进行了调查;79%的受访者表示,他们认为沟通绩效评估比三年前更重要。调查受访者还将测量和沟通功能的有效性列为通信行业面临的第二大重要问题。然而,并非所有通信行业的人都以同样的眼光看待测量。当一些人接受与通信相关的测量科学时,另一些人则将通信视为正式测量领域之外的艺术。两位企业沟通专家的名言说明了这种二分法:你无法管理你无法衡量的东西。每个人都在桌子前寻找一个座位,他们应该考虑如何到达桌子并呆在那里。比尔·马加里蒂斯(Bill Margaritis),美国联邦快递公司全球通信和IR高级副总裁,我对投资回报这个概念感到畏缩,因为这听起来像是我们所做的事情应该是如此可预测,而实际上却并非如此。尽管有一些人持反对意见,但大多数传播专业人士越来越认识到玛格丽蒂斯的话中的真理;如果没有关于其活动有效性的数据,传播专业人员就无法从高级管理人员那里获得他们所希望的信誉。在本文中,我们研究了度量对通信行业的重要性,通信中度量的不足,通信专业人员的度量需求如何变化,满足度量需求的障碍,以及理解通信与业务价值之间的联系所带来的潜在好处,以及一种新的可能的解决方案。这一讨论对于理解通信行业需要一种方式来为其已有的数据添加意义至关重要;将现有数据与业务成果联系起来;并证明有效的沟通活动推动组织实现其业务目标。在许多情况下,公司并不需要更多或更好的测量,只需要更好地利用现有的测量数据。一旦通信行业有能力了解其活动如何影响业务结果,通信专业人员就可以对业务结果产生更大的影响,而不是简单地证明他们过去所做的事情。为此,我们还讨论了我们认为衡量传播活动贡献的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信