{"title":"Team Teaching in Higher Education: Personalities, Leadership Styles, and Preferences","authors":"Haroon M. Malak, S. Gambescia","doi":"10.11114/ijce.v6i1.6082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to find out more about a) certain personality types, leadership styles, and teaching philosophies of those who have participated in team teaching, as well as b) their preferences for team teaching. These preliminary results ought to be helpful to faculty who may be asked to consider team teaching with a colleague(s), and results may help academic administrators assign and match faculty to team teach courses in their program offerings.Background: Given that few faculty have had the opportunity to team teach relative to the numerous courses they offer solo, there is a lack of focus, faculty development opportunities, and research on this subject. This does not, however, diminish the value of this method of delivering courses in higher education. Faculty may explore collaborative teaching in a number of ways, such as inviting a colleague to provide a one-time guest lecture, distributing assignments according to the collaborators' specialized knowledge, or working together on every part of the course.Methods: Using previously developed Myers-Briggs personality type finders and leadership style research tools, the participants' leadership and personality types were identified (Malak et al., 2022). People's experiences with teaching and preferences for leading vs. following were mapped using both qualitative (self-report) and quantitative (survey) approaches.Results: Sixty-three percent of the respondents identified as utilizing either servant leadership or coaching/mentoring. The majority of \"E\" type personalities like to \"Lead,\" especially in a team-teaching atmosphere, according to this study's findings. The traditional team-teaching method was adopted by 49% of the participants, while 26% used cooperative learning, 11% used integrated learning, 9% used parallel learning, and the remaining 6% used monitoring learning. It is important to highlight that more than 60% of the subjects who had \"E\" qualities had backgrounds in nursing, public health, health administration, or health care.Conclusions: In summary, the faculty survey data reveal an overall profile of the faculty who have team taught in higher education as an extrovert with a penchant for judging; who prefers to lead rather than follow; uses a coaching/mentoring or servant leadership style; and prefers high level cooperation with a colleague(s) in the full range of teaching/learning activities.","PeriodicalId":136179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Education","volume":"28 16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v6i1.6082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to find out more about a) certain personality types, leadership styles, and teaching philosophies of those who have participated in team teaching, as well as b) their preferences for team teaching. These preliminary results ought to be helpful to faculty who may be asked to consider team teaching with a colleague(s), and results may help academic administrators assign and match faculty to team teach courses in their program offerings.Background: Given that few faculty have had the opportunity to team teach relative to the numerous courses they offer solo, there is a lack of focus, faculty development opportunities, and research on this subject. This does not, however, diminish the value of this method of delivering courses in higher education. Faculty may explore collaborative teaching in a number of ways, such as inviting a colleague to provide a one-time guest lecture, distributing assignments according to the collaborators' specialized knowledge, or working together on every part of the course.Methods: Using previously developed Myers-Briggs personality type finders and leadership style research tools, the participants' leadership and personality types were identified (Malak et al., 2022). People's experiences with teaching and preferences for leading vs. following were mapped using both qualitative (self-report) and quantitative (survey) approaches.Results: Sixty-three percent of the respondents identified as utilizing either servant leadership or coaching/mentoring. The majority of "E" type personalities like to "Lead," especially in a team-teaching atmosphere, according to this study's findings. The traditional team-teaching method was adopted by 49% of the participants, while 26% used cooperative learning, 11% used integrated learning, 9% used parallel learning, and the remaining 6% used monitoring learning. It is important to highlight that more than 60% of the subjects who had "E" qualities had backgrounds in nursing, public health, health administration, or health care.Conclusions: In summary, the faculty survey data reveal an overall profile of the faculty who have team taught in higher education as an extrovert with a penchant for judging; who prefers to lead rather than follow; uses a coaching/mentoring or servant leadership style; and prefers high level cooperation with a colleague(s) in the full range of teaching/learning activities.
目的:本研究旨在了解参与过团队教学的学生的性格类型、领导风格和教学理念,以及他们对团队教学的偏好。这些初步结果应该对教师有帮助,他们可能会被要求考虑与同事进行团队教学,结果可能有助于学术管理人员分配和匹配教师在其项目提供的团队教学课程。背景:相对于他们单独提供的众多课程,很少有教师有机会进行团队教学,因此缺乏对这一主题的关注、教师发展机会和研究。然而,这并不会降低这种在高等教育中提供课程的方法的价值。教师可以通过多种方式探索合作教学,例如邀请一位同事提供一次客座讲座,根据合作者的专业知识分配作业,或者在课程的每个部分都进行合作。方法:使用先前开发的Myers-Briggs人格类型查找器和领导风格研究工具,确定参与者的领导和人格类型(Malak et al., 2022)。通过定性(自我报告)和定量(调查)两种方法绘制了人们的教学经历和领导与跟随的偏好。结果:63%的受访者确定使用仆人式领导或辅导/指导。根据这项研究的发现,大多数“E”型人格的人喜欢“领导”,尤其是在团队教学氛围中。49%的被试采用传统的团队教学方式,26%的被试采用合作学习方式,11%的被试采用整合学习方式,9%的被试采用平行学习方式,6%的被试采用监控学习方式。需要强调的是,60%以上具有“E”级素质的受试者具有护理、公共卫生、卫生管理或卫生保健方面的背景。结论:总而言之,教师调查数据揭示了在高等教育中进行过团队教学的教师的总体概况,他们是外向的,有判断的倾向;喜欢领导而不喜欢跟随的人;采用教练/指导或仆人式领导风格;喜欢在教学活动中与同事进行高水平的合作。