Perspectives and Agendas

S. Bains
{"title":"Perspectives and Agendas","authors":"S. Bains","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198822820.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Perspectives and Agendas” discusses why it’s important not to believe everything you read: even well-meaning experts often have specific perspectives based on their disciplines, their interests, and who their friends and rivals are. This chapter considers these agendas, where they come from, and why those who have negative things to say are often more useful than those who have a more positive outlook. It looks at trust, bias, competitive relationships, dependent relationships, expertise, disagreement, rivalry, and collaboration. It also considers the dangerous concept of “balance” and why it is too often used to avoid responsibility for making an informed judgment based on the available evidence.","PeriodicalId":386509,"journal":{"name":"Explaining the Future","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explaining the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198822820.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Perspectives and Agendas” discusses why it’s important not to believe everything you read: even well-meaning experts often have specific perspectives based on their disciplines, their interests, and who their friends and rivals are. This chapter considers these agendas, where they come from, and why those who have negative things to say are often more useful than those who have a more positive outlook. It looks at trust, bias, competitive relationships, dependent relationships, expertise, disagreement, rivalry, and collaboration. It also considers the dangerous concept of “balance” and why it is too often used to avoid responsibility for making an informed judgment based on the available evidence.
观点和议程
“观点和议程”讨论了为什么不要相信你所读到的一切是很重要的:即使是善意的专家通常也会根据他们的学科、兴趣以及他们的朋友和对手是谁而有特定的观点。本章将讨论这些议程,它们从何而来,以及为什么那些持消极观点的人往往比持积极观点的人更有用。它着眼于信任、偏见、竞争关系、依赖关系、专业知识、分歧、竞争和合作。它还考虑了“平衡”的危险概念,以及为什么它经常被用来逃避根据现有证据作出知情判断的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信