What rights matter? Examining the place of social rights in the EU's artificial intelligence policy debate

Jędrzej Niklas, L. Dencik
{"title":"What rights matter? Examining the place of social rights in the EU's artificial intelligence policy debate","authors":"Jędrzej Niklas, L. Dencik","doi":"10.14763/2021.3.1579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"References to ‘European values’ are often rooted in some perception of a commitment to particular rights that uphold certain principles about democracy and the relationship between state, market and citizens. Whilst rarely translated into consistent policy frameworks or activities, the formulation of new policy areas, such as artificial intelligence (AI), provide a window into what priorities, interests and concerns currently shape the European project. In this paper, we explore these questions in relation to the recent AI policy debate in the European Union with a particular focus on the place of social rights as a historically pertinent but neglected aspect of policy debates on technology. By examining submissions to the recent public consultation on the White Paper on AI Strategy, we argue that social rights occupy a marginal position in EU’s policy debates on emerging technologies in favour of human rights issues such as individual privacy and nondiscrimination that are often translated into design solutions or procedural safeguards and a commitment to market creation. This is important as systems such as AI are playing an increasingly important role for questions of redistribution and economic inequality that relate to social rights. As such, the AI policy debate both exposes and advances new normative conflicts over the meaning of rights as a central component of any attachment to ‘European values’. Issue 3 This paper is part of Governing “European values” inside data flows, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Kristina Irion, Mira Burri, Ans Kolk, Stefania Milan.","PeriodicalId":219999,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Rev.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

References to ‘European values’ are often rooted in some perception of a commitment to particular rights that uphold certain principles about democracy and the relationship between state, market and citizens. Whilst rarely translated into consistent policy frameworks or activities, the formulation of new policy areas, such as artificial intelligence (AI), provide a window into what priorities, interests and concerns currently shape the European project. In this paper, we explore these questions in relation to the recent AI policy debate in the European Union with a particular focus on the place of social rights as a historically pertinent but neglected aspect of policy debates on technology. By examining submissions to the recent public consultation on the White Paper on AI Strategy, we argue that social rights occupy a marginal position in EU’s policy debates on emerging technologies in favour of human rights issues such as individual privacy and nondiscrimination that are often translated into design solutions or procedural safeguards and a commitment to market creation. This is important as systems such as AI are playing an increasingly important role for questions of redistribution and economic inequality that relate to social rights. As such, the AI policy debate both exposes and advances new normative conflicts over the meaning of rights as a central component of any attachment to ‘European values’. Issue 3 This paper is part of Governing “European values” inside data flows, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Kristina Irion, Mira Burri, Ans Kolk, Stefania Milan.
什么权利重要?考察社会权利在欧盟人工智能政策辩论中的地位
提到“欧洲价值观”,往往根植于对某些特定权利的承诺,这些权利维护了有关民主的某些原则,以及国家、市场和公民之间的关系。虽然很少转化为一致的政策框架或活动,但新政策领域(如人工智能(AI))的制定为了解当前影响欧洲项目的优先事项、利益和关注点提供了一个窗口。在本文中,我们探讨了与欧盟最近的人工智能政策辩论相关的这些问题,特别关注社会权利作为技术政策辩论中历史相关但被忽视的方面的地位。通过审查提交给最近关于人工智能战略白皮书的公众咨询,我们认为,社会权利在欧盟关于新兴技术的政策辩论中占据边缘地位,有利于个人隐私和非歧视等人权问题,这些问题往往被转化为设计解决方案或程序保障以及对市场创造的承诺。这一点很重要,因为人工智能等系统在与社会权利相关的再分配和经济不平等问题上发挥着越来越重要的作用。因此,人工智能政策辩论既暴露又推进了新的规范性冲突,即权利的含义是任何对“欧洲价值观”的依恋的核心组成部分。本文是《互联网政策评论》特刊《管理数据流中的“欧洲价值观”》的一部分,由克里斯汀娜·伊里昂、米拉·布里、安斯·科尔克、斯特凡尼亚·米兰特约编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信