THE PATTERN OF TEST-TAKING EFFORT ACROSS ITEMS IN COGNITIVE ABILITY TEST: A LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS

Hanif Akhtar
{"title":"THE PATTERN OF TEST-TAKING EFFORT ACROSS ITEMS IN COGNITIVE ABILITY TEST: A LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS","authors":"Hanif Akhtar","doi":"10.33965/celda2022_202207l021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When examinees perceive a test as low stakes, it is logical to assume that some of them will not put out their maximum effort. This condition makes the validity of the test results more complicated. Although many studies have investigated motivational fluctuation across tests during a testing session, only a small number of studies have investigated motivational fluctuation across items within a single test. This study aims to examine the pattern of test-taking effort across items in cognitive ability tests when items are presented in a random order manner. Response Time Effort (RTE) was used as a measure of test-taking effort. This measure calculates the proportion of rapid responses in the test based on the response times for each item. Data from 213 university students completing the inductive reasoning test was examined using latent class analysis. The results suggested that examinees in low-stakes testing have different patterns of effort across items. Examinees who consistently provided a high level of effort across items had higher test performance, test-taking engagement, and RTE. Item position and item difficulty are also correlated negatively with test-taking effort. Implications of these results for researchers and practitioners are discussed.","PeriodicalId":200458,"journal":{"name":"Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022)","volume":"30 136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2022_202207l021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When examinees perceive a test as low stakes, it is logical to assume that some of them will not put out their maximum effort. This condition makes the validity of the test results more complicated. Although many studies have investigated motivational fluctuation across tests during a testing session, only a small number of studies have investigated motivational fluctuation across items within a single test. This study aims to examine the pattern of test-taking effort across items in cognitive ability tests when items are presented in a random order manner. Response Time Effort (RTE) was used as a measure of test-taking effort. This measure calculates the proportion of rapid responses in the test based on the response times for each item. Data from 213 university students completing the inductive reasoning test was examined using latent class analysis. The results suggested that examinees in low-stakes testing have different patterns of effort across items. Examinees who consistently provided a high level of effort across items had higher test performance, test-taking engagement, and RTE. Item position and item difficulty are also correlated negatively with test-taking effort. Implications of these results for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
认知能力测验中不同项目的试力模式:一个潜在类别分析
当考生认为一场考试的风险很低时,他们中的一些人不会尽最大努力,这是合乎逻辑的。这种情况使测试结果的有效性变得更加复杂。尽管许多研究调查了在一个测试阶段中不同测试之间的动机波动,但只有少数研究调查了单个测试中不同项目之间的动机波动。本研究旨在探讨在随机顺序的认知能力测试中,被试在不同测试项目之间的试力模式。响应时间努力(RTE)被用作测试努力的度量。该度量根据每个项目的响应时间计算测试中快速响应的比例。对213名完成归纳推理测试的大学生数据进行潜在类分析。结果表明,在低风险测试中,考生在不同项目上的努力模式不同。在各个项目上持续付出高水平努力的考生有更高的考试表现、考试参与度和RTE。题目位置和题目难度也与应试努力呈负相关。讨论了这些结果对研究人员和从业人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信