Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation: The Critique of Liberalism and the Emergence of Illiberalism

Tuğberk Samur
{"title":"Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation: The Critique of Liberalism and the Emergence of Illiberalism","authors":"Tuğberk Samur","doi":"10.53483/wcku3542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nineteenth-century Western civilization was based on four institutions: the balance of power, the international gold standard, the liberal state, and the self-regulating market. For Polanyi, the source and “matrix of the system” was the self-regulating market, which was the governing law of a liberal economy. The latter was a stark utopia that annihilated the substance of society. In his view, society would react to this by attempting to protect itself. Polanyi called this process, which destroyed nineteenth-century Western civilization, double movement. The origin of the destruction is rooted in “the utopian endeavor of economic liberalism to set up a self-regulating market system.” Fascism and socialism were responses to that self-regulating market. Polanyi’s thesis and analysis look very similar to the resurgence of illiberalism today. The expansion of neoliberal ideology brought about the “countermovement” of radicalism, which, at its root, is a reaction to the liberal utopia Polanyi mentioned. How can we understand Polanyi’s critique of liberalism and its relevance to contemporary liberalism in the sense of “double movement”?","PeriodicalId":370884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Illiberalism Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Illiberalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53483/wcku3542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nineteenth-century Western civilization was based on four institutions: the balance of power, the international gold standard, the liberal state, and the self-regulating market. For Polanyi, the source and “matrix of the system” was the self-regulating market, which was the governing law of a liberal economy. The latter was a stark utopia that annihilated the substance of society. In his view, society would react to this by attempting to protect itself. Polanyi called this process, which destroyed nineteenth-century Western civilization, double movement. The origin of the destruction is rooted in “the utopian endeavor of economic liberalism to set up a self-regulating market system.” Fascism and socialism were responses to that self-regulating market. Polanyi’s thesis and analysis look very similar to the resurgence of illiberalism today. The expansion of neoliberal ideology brought about the “countermovement” of radicalism, which, at its root, is a reaction to the liberal utopia Polanyi mentioned. How can we understand Polanyi’s critique of liberalism and its relevance to contemporary liberalism in the sense of “double movement”?
波兰尼的《大转型:对自由主义的批判与非自由主义的出现》
19世纪的西方文明建立在四大制度的基础上:权力平衡、国际金本位、自由主义国家和自我调节的市场。对波兰尼来说,这个体系的源头和“矩阵”是自我调节的市场,这是自由经济的支配法则。后者是一个彻底摧毁了社会实质的赤裸裸的乌托邦。在他看来,社会对此的反应是试图保护自己。波兰尼把这种摧毁了19世纪西方文明的过程称为双重运动。这种破坏的根源在于“经济自由主义建立自我调节的市场体系的乌托邦式努力”。法西斯主义和社会主义是对这种自我调节的市场的反应。波兰尼的论点和分析看起来与当今非自由主义的复苏非常相似。新自由主义意识形态的扩张带来了激进主义的“反运动”,其根源是对波兰尼所提到的自由主义乌托邦的一种反应。我们如何在“双重运动”的意义上理解波兰尼对自由主义的批判及其与当代自由主义的关联?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信