Divine and human agency in figurative language from John’s Gospel and Jodo‑Shinshu Buddhism

P. Richardson, Miori Nagashima
{"title":"Divine and human agency in figurative language from John’s Gospel and Jodo‑Shinshu Buddhism","authors":"P. Richardson, Miori Nagashima","doi":"10.1075/cogls.20011.ric","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper seeks to extend the focus of previous analyses of agency and metaphor in Christianity and Buddhism\n (Charteris-Black 2017; Chilton 2004;\n Richardson 2012; Richardson & Nagashima\n 2018) by comparing the results of a previous cognitive linguistic analysis of John 14:6 (Kövecses 2011) with an analysis of figurative language and agency patterns in an extract from a Jodo\n Shinshu Buddhist text (Wilson 2009). The comparative analysis highlights both locally\n contingent and more stable differences in both texts. However, we also discuss some highly schematic conceptual similarities that\n deserve further study. These include some similarities in their use of journey and light source domains, the\n role of the divine agent in the salvation process, one aspect of the divine entity embodying and acting as instrument for another\n aspect of the same divine entity, and the divine act being a paragon for human action.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"362 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20011.ric","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to extend the focus of previous analyses of agency and metaphor in Christianity and Buddhism (Charteris-Black 2017; Chilton 2004; Richardson 2012; Richardson & Nagashima 2018) by comparing the results of a previous cognitive linguistic analysis of John 14:6 (Kövecses 2011) with an analysis of figurative language and agency patterns in an extract from a Jodo Shinshu Buddhist text (Wilson 2009). The comparative analysis highlights both locally contingent and more stable differences in both texts. However, we also discuss some highly schematic conceptual similarities that deserve further study. These include some similarities in their use of journey and light source domains, the role of the divine agent in the salvation process, one aspect of the divine entity embodying and acting as instrument for another aspect of the same divine entity, and the divine act being a paragon for human action.
《约翰福音》和《神道信教》中比喻语言中的神和人的代理
本文试图扩展之前对基督教和佛教中的代理和隐喻的分析(Charteris-Black 2017;奇尔顿2004;理查森2012;Richardson & Nagashima 2018),通过比较之前对约翰福音14:6 (Kövecses 2011)的认知语言学分析结果与对Jodo信书佛教文本摘录中的比喻语言和代理模式的分析结果(Wilson 2009)。对比分析突出了两种文本的局部偶然差异和更稳定的差异。然而,我们也讨论了一些值得进一步研究的高度概要性概念相似性。这包括他们在旅程和光源领域的使用上的一些相似之处,在拯救过程中神圣代理的角色,神圣实体的一个方面体现并作为同一神圣实体的另一个方面的工具,以及神圣行为是人类行为的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信