This Nudge Was Not Enough: a Randomised Trial of Text Message Reminders of Court Dates to Victims and Witnesses

Jonathan R. Cumberbatch, G. Barnes
{"title":"This Nudge Was Not Enough: a Randomised Trial of Text Message Reminders of Court Dates to Victims and Witnesses","authors":"Jonathan R. Cumberbatch, G. Barnes","doi":"10.17863/CAM.24034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research QuestionDo text messages to mobile phones of victims and witnesses two or three days before they are scheduled to appear in court reduce their non-appearance rates in minor criminal cases?DataA sample of 811 victims and witnesses sent a postal notice to attend a specific magistrates’ court in Staffordshire on a specific date. Cambridge Crime Harm Index value of the criminal charges, court appearance and trial outcome data were collected in all cases.MethodsA text message reminder was randomly assigned to be sent to 405 treatment cases 2–3 days before the court trial date. Treatment as delivered comprised 84% of the treatment group.FindingsThe base rate of victims and witnesses not attending magistrates’ trials prior to the RCT was 26%. The non-attendance rate during the RCT was 22% in the control group and 24% in the treatment group (p = 0.444). A 14% higher guilty rate for trials attended by the treatment group (58%) than the control group (51%) was marginally significant (p = 0.052). No treatment-control differences in attendance were found when moderated by crime type or Crime Harm Index score.ConclusionA text message in isolation did not significantly affect victim and witness attendance at criminal cases in the three magistrates’ courts. However, it does show that texting is a reliable, quick and cheap method of communicating with witnesses.","PeriodicalId":217468,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.24034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Research QuestionDo text messages to mobile phones of victims and witnesses two or three days before they are scheduled to appear in court reduce their non-appearance rates in minor criminal cases?DataA sample of 811 victims and witnesses sent a postal notice to attend a specific magistrates’ court in Staffordshire on a specific date. Cambridge Crime Harm Index value of the criminal charges, court appearance and trial outcome data were collected in all cases.MethodsA text message reminder was randomly assigned to be sent to 405 treatment cases 2–3 days before the court trial date. Treatment as delivered comprised 84% of the treatment group.FindingsThe base rate of victims and witnesses not attending magistrates’ trials prior to the RCT was 26%. The non-attendance rate during the RCT was 22% in the control group and 24% in the treatment group (p = 0.444). A 14% higher guilty rate for trials attended by the treatment group (58%) than the control group (51%) was marginally significant (p = 0.052). No treatment-control differences in attendance were found when moderated by crime type or Crime Harm Index score.ConclusionA text message in isolation did not significantly affect victim and witness attendance at criminal cases in the three magistrates’ courts. However, it does show that texting is a reliable, quick and cheap method of communicating with witnesses.
这种推动是不够的:一项随机试验的短信提醒受害者和证人的法庭日期
研究问题:在轻微刑事案件中,给受害者和证人在出庭前两三天发短信能降低他们不出庭的几率吗?对811名受害者和证人的样本进行了邮寄通知,要求他们在特定日期出席斯塔福德郡一个特定的地方法院。收集了所有案件的刑事指控、出庭和审判结果的剑桥犯罪危害指数值。方法在开庭前2 ~ 3 d随机向405例治疗病例发送短信提醒。接受治疗的占治疗组的84%。调查结果:在随机对照试验之前,受害者和证人不参加地方法官审判的基本比率为26%。对照组和治疗组在RCT期间的缺勤率分别为22%和24% (p = 0.444)。治疗组参加审判的有罪率(58%)比对照组(51%)高14%,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.052)。当犯罪类型或犯罪伤害指数得分缓和时,没有发现治疗-控制在出勤方面的差异。结论短信对刑事案件被害人和证人的出庭率无显著影响。然而,它确实表明发短信是一种可靠、快速和廉价的与证人交流的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信