Evaluating learning approaches for product assembly: using chunking of instructions, spatial augmented reality and display based work instructions

E. Wilschut, R. Könemann, Molly S. Murphy, G. V. Rhijn, T. Bosch
{"title":"Evaluating learning approaches for product assembly: using chunking of instructions, spatial augmented reality and display based work instructions","authors":"E. Wilschut, R. Könemann, Molly S. Murphy, G. V. Rhijn, T. Bosch","doi":"10.1145/3316782.3322750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Augmented Reality (AR) as an assistive technology is a promising tool for novice operators to learn assembly processes. This experiment compared an AR instruction method to display based electronic working instructions (EWI) for product assembly, to assess learning during the first repetitions of the products. In addition, two types of work instructions were used, i.e., standard and chunk instructions. In this experiment a chunk instruction consists of six assembly steps. Effects of the instruction method and type on the learning phase were evaluated with 24 novice operators building two products i.e.. Operators were then asked to build the same products without instructions in order to assess learned skills and establish effects on the recall phase, also as a result of instruction method and type. Task completion time (TCT), product quality, operator workload and learning curve were measured. The learning curve, as indicated by the TCT, took place during the first three repetitions of product assembly. Instruction method and instruction type had no effect on the learning curve. Product quality was high and no differences were found between learning conditions. Operator workload revealed that chunking of the instruction increased workload during the learning phase. During the recall phase, the AR group's TCT increased 19.2%, but only for the first product's repetition without instruction. Product quality remained the same during the recall phase, however operator workload was reduced for chunk learned products. This study indicates that chunking of instructions should be avoided for novice workers. Both EWI and AR can be used for teaching new assembly procedures. While AR and EWI are useful during the learning phase, there are indications that these methods might hinder the operator once they required the necessary skills and knowledge to assemble the product. A possible solution is making instructions more adaptive to fit the skill proficiency of the operator.","PeriodicalId":264425,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3316782.3322750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) as an assistive technology is a promising tool for novice operators to learn assembly processes. This experiment compared an AR instruction method to display based electronic working instructions (EWI) for product assembly, to assess learning during the first repetitions of the products. In addition, two types of work instructions were used, i.e., standard and chunk instructions. In this experiment a chunk instruction consists of six assembly steps. Effects of the instruction method and type on the learning phase were evaluated with 24 novice operators building two products i.e.. Operators were then asked to build the same products without instructions in order to assess learned skills and establish effects on the recall phase, also as a result of instruction method and type. Task completion time (TCT), product quality, operator workload and learning curve were measured. The learning curve, as indicated by the TCT, took place during the first three repetitions of product assembly. Instruction method and instruction type had no effect on the learning curve. Product quality was high and no differences were found between learning conditions. Operator workload revealed that chunking of the instruction increased workload during the learning phase. During the recall phase, the AR group's TCT increased 19.2%, but only for the first product's repetition without instruction. Product quality remained the same during the recall phase, however operator workload was reduced for chunk learned products. This study indicates that chunking of instructions should be avoided for novice workers. Both EWI and AR can be used for teaching new assembly procedures. While AR and EWI are useful during the learning phase, there are indications that these methods might hinder the operator once they required the necessary skills and knowledge to assemble the product. A possible solution is making instructions more adaptive to fit the skill proficiency of the operator.
评估产品装配的学习方法:使用指令分块、空间增强现实和基于显示的工作指令
增强现实(AR)作为一种辅助技术,对于新手操作人员学习装配过程是一种很有前途的工具。本实验比较了AR指导方法与基于显示的产品组装电子工作指令(EWI),以评估产品首次重复期间的学习情况。此外,使用了两种类型的工作指令,即标准指令和块指令。在本实验中,块指令由六个组装步骤组成。本研究以24位新手为研究对象,以制作两种产品,分别为。然后要求操作人员在没有指示的情况下制作相同的产品,以评估所学技能并确定对回忆阶段的影响,这也是指示方法和类型的结果。测量任务完成时间(TCT)、产品质量、操作员工作量和学习曲线。如TCT所示,学习曲线发生在产品组装的前三次重复中。教学方法和教学类型对学习曲线没有影响。产品质量高,不同学习条件下无差异。操作员工作量表明,指令分块增加了学习阶段的工作量。在召回阶段,AR组的TCT增加了19.2%,但只是在没有说明的情况下重复第一种产品。在召回阶段,产品质量保持不变,但减少了操作员对块学习产品的工作量。本研究表明,新手应避免将指令分块。EWI和AR都可以用于教授新的装配程序。虽然AR和EWI在学习阶段是有用的,但有迹象表明,一旦操作员需要必要的技能和知识来组装产品,这些方法可能会阻碍他们。一个可能的解决方案是使指令更具适应性,以适应操作员的技能熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信