Classifying Pedagogical Material to Improve Adoption of Parallel and Distributed Computing Topics

Alec Goncharow, Anna Boekelheide, Matthew Mcquaigue, David Burlinson, Erik Saule, K. Subramanian, J. Payton
{"title":"Classifying Pedagogical Material to Improve Adoption of Parallel and Distributed Computing Topics","authors":"Alec Goncharow, Anna Boekelheide, Matthew Mcquaigue, David Burlinson, Erik Saule, K. Subramanian, J. Payton","doi":"10.1109/IPDPSW.2019.00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The NSF/IEEE-TCPP Parallel and Distributed Computing curriculum guidelines released in 2012 (PDC12) is an effort to bring more parallel computing education to early computer science courses. It has been moderately successful, with the inclusion of some PDC topics in the ACM/IEEE Computer Science curriculum guidelines in 2013 (CS13) and some coverage of topics in early CS courses in some universities in the U.S. and around the world. A reason often cited for the lack of a broader adoption is the difficulty for instructors who are not already knowledgable in PDC topics to learn how to teach those topics and align their learning objectives with early CS courses. There have been attempts at bringing textbook chapters, lecture slides, assignments, and demos to the hands of the instructors of early CS classes. However, the effort required to plow through all the available materials and figure out what is relevant to a particular class is daunting. This paper argues that classifying pedagogical materials against the CS13 guidelines and the PDC12 guidelines can provide the means necessary to reduce the burden of adoption for instructors. In this paper, we present CAR-CS, a system that can be used to categorize pedagogical materials according to well-known and established curricular guidelines and show that CAR-CS can be leveraged 1) by PDC experts to identify topics for which pedagogical material does not exist and that should be developed, 2) by instructors of early CS courses to find materials that are similar to the one that they use but that also cover PDC topics, 3) by instructors to check the topics that a course currently covers and those it does not cover.","PeriodicalId":292054,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)","volume":"44 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2019.00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The NSF/IEEE-TCPP Parallel and Distributed Computing curriculum guidelines released in 2012 (PDC12) is an effort to bring more parallel computing education to early computer science courses. It has been moderately successful, with the inclusion of some PDC topics in the ACM/IEEE Computer Science curriculum guidelines in 2013 (CS13) and some coverage of topics in early CS courses in some universities in the U.S. and around the world. A reason often cited for the lack of a broader adoption is the difficulty for instructors who are not already knowledgable in PDC topics to learn how to teach those topics and align their learning objectives with early CS courses. There have been attempts at bringing textbook chapters, lecture slides, assignments, and demos to the hands of the instructors of early CS classes. However, the effort required to plow through all the available materials and figure out what is relevant to a particular class is daunting. This paper argues that classifying pedagogical materials against the CS13 guidelines and the PDC12 guidelines can provide the means necessary to reduce the burden of adoption for instructors. In this paper, we present CAR-CS, a system that can be used to categorize pedagogical materials according to well-known and established curricular guidelines and show that CAR-CS can be leveraged 1) by PDC experts to identify topics for which pedagogical material does not exist and that should be developed, 2) by instructors of early CS courses to find materials that are similar to the one that they use but that also cover PDC topics, 3) by instructors to check the topics that a course currently covers and those it does not cover.
对教学材料进行分类以提高并行和分布式计算主题的采用
2012年发布的NSF/IEEE-TCPP并行和分布式计算课程指南(PDC12)是将更多并行计算教育引入早期计算机科学课程的一项努力。它已经取得了一定的成功,在2013年ACM/IEEE计算机科学课程指南(CS13)中包含了一些PDC主题,并且在美国和世界各地的一些大学的早期CS课程中包含了一些主题。缺乏广泛采用的一个原因是,对于尚未掌握PDC主题知识的教师来说,很难学习如何教授这些主题,并使他们的学习目标与早期CS课程保持一致。有人尝试将教科书章节、讲座幻灯片、作业和演示带到早期计算机科学课程的教师手中。然而,翻阅所有可用材料并找出与特定课程相关的内容所需要的努力是令人望而生畏的。本文认为,根据CS13指南和PDC12指南对教材进行分类,可以为教师减轻采用教材的负担提供必要的手段。在本文中,我们提出了CAR-CS,一个可用于根据知名和已建立的课程指南对教学材料进行分类的系统,并表明CAR-CS可以被PDC专家利用,以确定不存在的教学材料的主题,并且应该开发这些主题,2)早期CS课程的讲师可以找到与他们使用的材料相似但也涵盖PDC主题的材料。3)由教师检查课程目前涵盖和未涵盖的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信