Text-Based versus video discussion boards to promote a sense of community with graduate online students: A student perspective

Gabriel De Freitas, Iris Billy, Charles Crain
{"title":"Text-Based versus video discussion boards to promote a sense of community with graduate online students: A student perspective","authors":"Gabriel De Freitas, Iris Billy, Charles Crain","doi":"10.24052/ijhem/v09n02/art-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For university administrators creating an engaging online course where students feel part of an online community can be challenging even for the most experienced online educator. Online discussions are a common tool used to connect students in online courses, but it is often limited to text-based posts. This research paper will compare the use of text-based versus video-based discussions in online courses to ascertain students’ perceptions of social presence in the course room. This paper will discuss which method of discussion would be an appropriate exchange for a live classroom discussion, this is not always the case online. Research has demonstrated that text-based discussions often do not promote genuine communication and an alternative to text-based discussion forums is video-based discussion. The strategy of text-based discussion is employable in most popular learning management systems such as Canvas or Blackboard or with a variety of other tools such as YouTube or Voice thread to accommodate the use of video discussion in online courses. Researchers have been keenly exploring the implications of these two formats on engagement, comprehension, and overall effectiveness. This study delved into the key findings from community experiences by online students comparing and contrasting text-based and video-based discussions, examining their impact, and shedding light on their relative advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this research paper was to compare the sense of community experienced by online students taking part in text-based versus video-based discussions. The implications of this study indicated that most of the students reported that they preferred text-based discussions; however, the students in this study felt video-based discussion boards promoted the ability to form connections with their learning community.","PeriodicalId":148689,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Higher Education Management","volume":"39 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Higher Education Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/ijhem/v09n02/art-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For university administrators creating an engaging online course where students feel part of an online community can be challenging even for the most experienced online educator. Online discussions are a common tool used to connect students in online courses, but it is often limited to text-based posts. This research paper will compare the use of text-based versus video-based discussions in online courses to ascertain students’ perceptions of social presence in the course room. This paper will discuss which method of discussion would be an appropriate exchange for a live classroom discussion, this is not always the case online. Research has demonstrated that text-based discussions often do not promote genuine communication and an alternative to text-based discussion forums is video-based discussion. The strategy of text-based discussion is employable in most popular learning management systems such as Canvas or Blackboard or with a variety of other tools such as YouTube or Voice thread to accommodate the use of video discussion in online courses. Researchers have been keenly exploring the implications of these two formats on engagement, comprehension, and overall effectiveness. This study delved into the key findings from community experiences by online students comparing and contrasting text-based and video-based discussions, examining their impact, and shedding light on their relative advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this research paper was to compare the sense of community experienced by online students taking part in text-based versus video-based discussions. The implications of this study indicated that most of the students reported that they preferred text-based discussions; however, the students in this study felt video-based discussion boards promoted the ability to form connections with their learning community.
基于文本与视频的讨论板促进研究生在线学生的社区意识:一个学生的观点
对于大学管理者来说,创建一个吸引人的在线课程,让学生感到自己是在线社区的一部分,即使对最有经验的在线教育者来说,也是一项挑战。在线讨论是在线课程中联系学生的常用工具,但它通常仅限于基于文本的帖子。这篇研究论文将比较在线课程中基于文本和基于视频的讨论的使用,以确定学生对课堂上社交存在的看法。本文将讨论哪种讨论方法适合于现场课堂讨论,这在网上并不总是如此。研究表明,基于文本的讨论往往不能促进真正的交流,而基于文本的讨论论坛的另一种选择是基于视频的讨论。基于文本的讨论策略适用于最流行的学习管理系统,如Canvas或Blackboard,或与各种其他工具(如YouTube或Voice线程)一起,以适应在线课程中视频讨论的使用。研究人员一直在敏锐地探索这两种形式对参与、理解和整体效率的影响。这项研究通过在线学生比较和对比基于文本和视频的讨论,深入研究了社区经验的主要发现,研究了它们的影响,并阐明了它们的相对优势和劣势。本研究论文的目的是比较在线学生参加基于文本的讨论和基于视频的讨论所经历的社区感。本研究的意义表明,大多数学生报告说他们更喜欢基于文本的讨论;然而,在这项研究中,学生们认为基于视频的讨论板促进了他们与学习社区建立联系的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信