Study on the Relationship between Subjective Oral Dryness and Stimulated Saliva or Oral Mucosal Moisture

Fumi Takahashi, Mutsumi Takahashi, S. Toya, O. Morita
{"title":"Study on the Relationship between Subjective Oral Dryness and Stimulated Saliva or Oral Mucosal Moisture","authors":"Fumi Takahashi, Mutsumi Takahashi, S. Toya, O. Morita","doi":"10.2186/PRP.7.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between subjective oral dryness and stimulated saliva or oral moisture.Methods: Twenty-one patients with subjective oral dryness (OD) and 21 healthy adults (HA) were enrolled in the study. The Saxon test was performed by chewing a gauze sponge for 2 minutes. Oral moisture was measured at the lingual mucosa (LM) and buccal mucosa (BM) by using an oral moisture checking device. Group differences in the amount of stimulated saliva and oral moisture were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t test.Results: The average amount of salivary secretion in OD and HA in the Saxon test was 0.65 ± 0.55 and 2.34 ± 1.41 g/2 min, respectively; the difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.01). The oral moisture at the LM in OD and HA was 27.2% ± 2.9% and 32.3% ± 1.7%, respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.01). The oral moisture at the BM in OD and HA was 32.6% ± 2.1% and 34.0% ± 2.2%, respectively; this difference was also significant (p < 0.05).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the amount of stimulated saliva became less than 2.00 g and the moisture at the LM became less than 30.0% in patients with subjective oral dryness. These results suggest that stimulated saliva and oral moisture are related to subjective oral dryness; thus, both the Saxon test and the test using an oral moisture checking device are useful for the assessment of subjective oral dryness.","PeriodicalId":306414,"journal":{"name":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.7.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between subjective oral dryness and stimulated saliva or oral moisture.Methods: Twenty-one patients with subjective oral dryness (OD) and 21 healthy adults (HA) were enrolled in the study. The Saxon test was performed by chewing a gauze sponge for 2 minutes. Oral moisture was measured at the lingual mucosa (LM) and buccal mucosa (BM) by using an oral moisture checking device. Group differences in the amount of stimulated saliva and oral moisture were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t test.Results: The average amount of salivary secretion in OD and HA in the Saxon test was 0.65 ± 0.55 and 2.34 ± 1.41 g/2 min, respectively; the difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.01). The oral moisture at the LM in OD and HA was 27.2% ± 2.9% and 32.3% ± 1.7%, respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.01). The oral moisture at the BM in OD and HA was 32.6% ± 2.1% and 34.0% ± 2.2%, respectively; this difference was also significant (p < 0.05).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the amount of stimulated saliva became less than 2.00 g and the moisture at the LM became less than 30.0% in patients with subjective oral dryness. These results suggest that stimulated saliva and oral moisture are related to subjective oral dryness; thus, both the Saxon test and the test using an oral moisture checking device are useful for the assessment of subjective oral dryness.
主观口腔干燥与刺激唾液或口腔黏膜水分关系的研究
目的:探讨主观口腔干燥与刺激唾液或口腔水分的关系。方法:选取21例主观口腔干燥(OD)患者和21例健康成人(HA)作为研究对象。撒克逊试验采用咀嚼海绵纱布2分钟的方法。采用口腔水分测定仪在舌黏膜(LM)和颊黏膜(BM)测量口腔水分。刺激唾液量和口腔水分的组间差异采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Student's t检验进行比较。结果:Saxon试验中OD和HA的平均唾液分泌量分别为0.65±0.55和2.34±1.41 g/2 min;各组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。OD组和HA组LM处口腔水分分别为27.2%±2.9%和32.3%±1.7%;差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。OD组和HA组BM处口腔水分分别为32.6%±2.1%和34.0%±2.2%;差异也有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究表明,主观口腔干燥患者刺激唾液量小于2.00 g, LM处水分小于30.0%。这些结果表明,刺激唾液和口腔水分与主观口腔干燥有关;因此,Saxon测试和使用口腔湿度检查装置的测试都可用于主观口腔干燥的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信