Distribution of the Intensity of Spontaneous Breathing Effort During Mechanical Ventilation

M. Iftikhar, J. Dianti, J. Wong, M. Long, S. Fard, M. Urner, L. Del Sorbo, N. D. Ferguson, E. Fan, E. Goligher
{"title":"Distribution of the Intensity of Spontaneous Breathing Effort During Mechanical Ventilation","authors":"M. Iftikhar, J. Dianti, J. Wong, M. Long, S. Fard, M. Urner, L. Del Sorbo, N. D. Ferguson, E. Fan, E. Goligher","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a4903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale:Both insufficient and excessive respiratory effort during mechanical ventilation are associated with lung and diaphragm injury, and poor outcome. The characteristics of respiratory effort under MV has not been systematically described. The expiratory occlusion pressure (Pocc) is a non-invasive technique to estimate effort and lung-distending pressure from spontaneous breathing during MV. We set out to describe the frequency and magnitude of effort and lung-distending pressure in patients receiving MV. Methods:In a retrospective cohort study, we collected data from charts of patients receiving invasive MV at Toronto General Hospital from July 2019 to June 2021. Pocc is routinely measured once daily in every patient on MV. Data on patient demographic characteristics and ventilator settings was collected in a registry of ventilated patients in Toronto. For each day, we calculated the proportion of patients in whom effort was absent (Pocc = 0), low (Pocc -1 to -5 cm H2O), moderate (-5 to -15 cm H2O), high (-16 to -30 cm H2O), and very high (< -30 cm H2O). Excessive dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure was defined as estimated ΔPL,dyn was >20 cm H2O. Results:We included 854 patients who received invasive MV for at least 1 day. Of 577 patients in whom Pocc was measured on day 1 (within 24 hours of initiation of MV), effort was absent in 434 (75%) patients, moderate in 70 (12%), and high or very high 43 (7%). Of 328 patients in whom Pocc was measured on day 5, effort was absent in 127 (39%) patients, moderate in 80 (24%) patients and high or very high in 91 (28%). Among spontaneously breathing patients (Pocc <0 cm H2O), estimated dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure exceeded 20 cm H2O in 49/116 (42%) on day 1 and 77/150 (51%) on day 5. On patient-days on which estimated dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure exceeded 20 cm H2O, on average the ventilator contributed 62% (SD 24%) of total lung-distending pressure and the patient contributed 38% (SD 24%) of total lung-distending pressure. Over days 1 through 10, respiratory efforts were more vigorous in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia compared to those without (mean Pocc -12 cm H2O vs -7 cm H2O, p= <0.01). Conclusions:Respiratory effort is frequently absent or excessive during MV. Patients frequently exhibited excessive lung-distending pressures during spontaneous breathing. COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher respiratory effort. (Figure Presented).","PeriodicalId":341041,"journal":{"name":"C104. CHANGE IS HAPPENING AT A RAPID RATE: ARDS AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION, GO","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C104. CHANGE IS HAPPENING AT A RAPID RATE: ARDS AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION, GO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a4903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale:Both insufficient and excessive respiratory effort during mechanical ventilation are associated with lung and diaphragm injury, and poor outcome. The characteristics of respiratory effort under MV has not been systematically described. The expiratory occlusion pressure (Pocc) is a non-invasive technique to estimate effort and lung-distending pressure from spontaneous breathing during MV. We set out to describe the frequency and magnitude of effort and lung-distending pressure in patients receiving MV. Methods:In a retrospective cohort study, we collected data from charts of patients receiving invasive MV at Toronto General Hospital from July 2019 to June 2021. Pocc is routinely measured once daily in every patient on MV. Data on patient demographic characteristics and ventilator settings was collected in a registry of ventilated patients in Toronto. For each day, we calculated the proportion of patients in whom effort was absent (Pocc = 0), low (Pocc -1 to -5 cm H2O), moderate (-5 to -15 cm H2O), high (-16 to -30 cm H2O), and very high (< -30 cm H2O). Excessive dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure was defined as estimated ΔPL,dyn was >20 cm H2O. Results:We included 854 patients who received invasive MV for at least 1 day. Of 577 patients in whom Pocc was measured on day 1 (within 24 hours of initiation of MV), effort was absent in 434 (75%) patients, moderate in 70 (12%), and high or very high 43 (7%). Of 328 patients in whom Pocc was measured on day 5, effort was absent in 127 (39%) patients, moderate in 80 (24%) patients and high or very high in 91 (28%). Among spontaneously breathing patients (Pocc <0 cm H2O), estimated dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure exceeded 20 cm H2O in 49/116 (42%) on day 1 and 77/150 (51%) on day 5. On patient-days on which estimated dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure exceeded 20 cm H2O, on average the ventilator contributed 62% (SD 24%) of total lung-distending pressure and the patient contributed 38% (SD 24%) of total lung-distending pressure. Over days 1 through 10, respiratory efforts were more vigorous in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia compared to those without (mean Pocc -12 cm H2O vs -7 cm H2O, p= <0.01). Conclusions:Respiratory effort is frequently absent or excessive during MV. Patients frequently exhibited excessive lung-distending pressures during spontaneous breathing. COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher respiratory effort. (Figure Presented).
机械通气过程中自主呼吸强度的分布
理由:机械通气时呼吸力不足和过度均与肺和膈肌损伤有关,预后不良。MV下呼吸力的特征还没有系统的描述。呼气闭塞压(Pocc)是一种非侵入性的技术,用于估计自发性呼吸时的用力和肺扩张压力。我们开始描述频率和力度的努力和肺扩张压力的患者接受MV。方法:在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们收集了2019年7月至2021年6月在多伦多总医院接受有创MV的患者的图表数据。每名接受MV治疗的患者每日例行测量一次Pocc。患者人口学特征和呼吸机设置的数据收集在多伦多的通气患者登记处。对于每一天,我们计算了没有努力的患者的比例(Pocc = 0),低(Pocc -1至-5 cm H2O),中度(Pocc -5至-15 cm H2O),高(Pocc -16至-30 cm H2O)和非常高(< -30 cm H2O)。动态跨肺驱动压过高定义为估算值ΔPL,dyn >20 cm H2O。结果:我们纳入了854例接受有创MV治疗至少1天的患者。在第1天(MV开始的24小时内)测量Pocc的577例患者中,434例(75%)患者没有努力,70例(12%)中度,43例(7%)高或非常高。在第5天测量Pocc的328例患者中,127例(39%)患者没有努力,80例(24%)患者中度,91例(28%)患者高或非常高。在自发呼吸患者(Pocc <0 cm H2O)中,第1天估计动态跨肺驱动压超过20 cm H2O的患者有49/116(42%),第5天估计动态跨肺驱动压超过77/150(51%)。在估计动态跨肺驱动压力超过20 cm H2O的患者天数中,呼吸机平均贡献了总肺扩张压力的62% (SD 24%),患者平均贡献了总肺扩张压力的38% (SD 24%)。在第1天至第10天,与未感染COVID-19肺炎的患者相比,感染COVID-19肺炎的患者呼吸活动更加剧烈(平均Pocc -12 cm H2O vs -7 cm H2O, p= <0.01)。结论:中压时呼吸力常缺失或过度。患者在自主呼吸时经常表现出过度的肺扩张压力。COVID-19肺炎与更高的呼吸努力有关。(图)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信