Progress reports and novices' understanding of program code

Linda Mannila
{"title":"Progress reports and novices' understanding of program code","authors":"Linda Mannila","doi":"10.1145/1315803.1315810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces progress reports and describes how these can be used as a tool to evaluate student learning and understanding during programming courses. A progress report includes a short piece of program code (on paper), covering topics recently introduced in the course, and four questions. The two first questions are of a \"trace and explain\" type, asking the students to describe the functionality of the program using their own words - both line by line and as a whole. The two other questions aim at gaining insight into the students' own opinions of their learning, as they are asked to write down what they think they have learned so far in the course and what they have experienced as most difficult.\n Results from using progress reports in an introductory programming course at secondary level are presented. The responses to the \"trace and explain\" questions were categorized based on the level of overall understanding manifested. We also analyzed students' understanding of individual programming concepts, both based on their code explanations and on their own opinions on what they had experienced as difficult. Our initial experience from using the progress reports is positive, as we feel that they provide valuable information during the course, which most likely would remain uncovered otherwise.","PeriodicalId":135065,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Sea '06","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Sea '06","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1315803.1315810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This paper introduces progress reports and describes how these can be used as a tool to evaluate student learning and understanding during programming courses. A progress report includes a short piece of program code (on paper), covering topics recently introduced in the course, and four questions. The two first questions are of a "trace and explain" type, asking the students to describe the functionality of the program using their own words - both line by line and as a whole. The two other questions aim at gaining insight into the students' own opinions of their learning, as they are asked to write down what they think they have learned so far in the course and what they have experienced as most difficult. Results from using progress reports in an introductory programming course at secondary level are presented. The responses to the "trace and explain" questions were categorized based on the level of overall understanding manifested. We also analyzed students' understanding of individual programming concepts, both based on their code explanations and on their own opinions on what they had experienced as difficult. Our initial experience from using the progress reports is positive, as we feel that they provide valuable information during the course, which most likely would remain uncovered otherwise.
进度报告和新手对程序代码的理解
本文介绍了进度报告,并描述了如何将这些报告用作评估学生在编程课程中的学习和理解的工具。进度报告包括一小段程序代码(在纸上),涵盖课程中最近介绍的主题,以及四个问题。前两个问题是“跟踪和解释”类型的,要求学生用自己的话描述程序的功能——一行一行地描述,也可以作为一个整体。另外两个问题旨在了解学生对自己学习的看法,因为他们被要求写下他们认为到目前为止他们在课程中学到了什么,以及他们认为最困难的是什么。本文介绍了在中学编程入门课程中使用进度报告的结果。对“追踪和解释”问题的回答根据所表现的整体理解水平进行分类。我们还分析了学生对个别编程概念的理解,既基于他们对代码的解释,也基于他们对自己所经历的困难的看法。我们从使用进度报告中获得的初步经验是积极的,因为我们觉得它们在课程中提供了有价值的信息,否则这些信息很可能不会被发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信