Evaluation of Sustainable Mobility Measures Using Fuzzy COPRAS Method

Tanja Parezanović, Nataša Bojković, Marijana Petrović, S. P. Tarle
{"title":"Evaluation of Sustainable Mobility Measures Using Fuzzy COPRAS Method","authors":"Tanja Parezanović, Nataša Bojković, Marijana Petrović, S. P. Tarle","doi":"10.7595/MANAGEMENT.FON.2016.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of decision making in a complex system such as transport is often conducted in the presence of a large number of criteria that are often conflicting and whose values are expressed in different units. This paper presents a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach for evaluating sustainable mobility measures based on qualitative information. The usage of both types of criteria (or only qualitative) in the process of evaluation of sustainable mobility measures is possible thanks to the fuzzy expansion of the multi-criteria decision making methods. The proposed procedure for the evaluation of sustainable mobility measures encompasses selection of measures, criteria and ranking selected measures using the fuzzy COPRAS method. The aim of the proposed method is ranking sustainable mobility measures on the basis of previous experiences. The method enables cities that have not yet implemented these measures to gain an insight into what to expect and establish priorities. The paper demonstrates the potentials and suitability of fuzzy COPRAS in making decisions on mobility measures. Accordingly, twenty six measures are evaluated and the most promising ones have been obtained.","PeriodicalId":116669,"journal":{"name":"Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7595/MANAGEMENT.FON.2016.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The process of decision making in a complex system such as transport is often conducted in the presence of a large number of criteria that are often conflicting and whose values are expressed in different units. This paper presents a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach for evaluating sustainable mobility measures based on qualitative information. The usage of both types of criteria (or only qualitative) in the process of evaluation of sustainable mobility measures is possible thanks to the fuzzy expansion of the multi-criteria decision making methods. The proposed procedure for the evaluation of sustainable mobility measures encompasses selection of measures, criteria and ranking selected measures using the fuzzy COPRAS method. The aim of the proposed method is ranking sustainable mobility measures on the basis of previous experiences. The method enables cities that have not yet implemented these measures to gain an insight into what to expect and establish priorities. The paper demonstrates the potentials and suitability of fuzzy COPRAS in making decisions on mobility measures. Accordingly, twenty six measures are evaluated and the most promising ones have been obtained.
基于模糊COPRAS方法的可持续交通措施评价
在运输等复杂系统中,决策过程通常是在存在大量标准的情况下进行的,这些标准往往相互冲突,其价值以不同的单位表示。本文提出了一种基于定性信息的多准则决策(MCDM)方法来评价可持续交通措施。由于多准则决策方法的模糊扩展,在评价可持续流动性措施的过程中可以同时使用两种标准(或仅使用定性标准)。拟议的可持续流动性措施评价程序包括选择措施、标准和使用模糊COPRAS方法对选定措施进行排序。拟议方法的目的是根据以往的经验对可持续流动性措施进行排名。该方法使尚未实施这些措施的城市能够深入了解预期的情况并确定优先事项。本文论证了模糊COPRAS在流动性措施决策中的潜力和适用性。据此,对26项措施进行了评价,得出了最有希望的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信