Assessment of Menorrhagia Associated with Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Device (Cut 380a) Among Women Attending Idi-Ogungun Primary Health Care Centre, Ibadan North Local Government Area of Oyo State

Dauda Rifkatu Samaila
{"title":"Assessment of Menorrhagia Associated with Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Device (Cut 380a) Among Women Attending Idi-Ogungun Primary Health Care Centre, Ibadan North Local Government Area of Oyo State","authors":"Dauda Rifkatu Samaila","doi":"10.21522/tijnr.2015.04.02.art001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is global use of IUD among women. It is seen as the safest and reversible family planning method compared to other methods. It is a wise choice for women within the sexual active period of life that are yet to commence or complete the number of children so desired and to also prevent unwanted pregnancy and the consequences of abortion. For the married couples yet to complete number of children desired it serves as a form of child spacing method of choice with high level reliability. Despite its safety and reversibility, it uses in developing country like America is low, estimated at 2% in 2002 (Mosher, 2004). Based on 2004 United Nations data, Eastern and Western Europe represent 4-5% of global IUD use. The reason for this low practice may be associated with its possible side effects like menorrhagia. However, WHO estimates that approximately 160 million women worldwide use IUDs today. China has an estimated two-thirds of these users, or 96 million. Only a small percentage of current users are in Eastern or Western Europe or other industrialized countries (10%). The remaining 24% are in developing countries other than China, concentrated in Vietnam, Egypt, Indonesia, India, and Uzbekistan, and Turkey – those six countries alone contain half of all users in developing countries excluding China. All developing countries fall into the following clusters, which show widely different determinants of use rates. They also help to identify programmatic reasons for greater or lesser uptake, (WHO, 2007). In Nigeria according to Dinwoke V, Okafor C, Eke A, (2015) in a study conducted in an Eastern Nigerian Teaching Hospital “the IUD was the most popular, being accepted by 56.7% of all clients” of all family methods. This was attributed to some women believe that using modern methods would endanger their health and future fertility. This concede with a study carried out in Port Harcourt, south-south Nigeriaby Enyindah C, Ojule J, Bassey G, indicating IUCD users in the range of 47 to 66% of contraceptive acceptors in different family planning centers and it is used longer than other reversible contraceptive methods. Though it is the safest reversible family planning method studies have associated it with the leading cause of menorrhagia among family planning user as shown in this study compared to other complications in Eastern Nigeria Teaching Hospital in which “No complication 83% 275, Menorrhagia/ irregular bleeding 23%, Abnormal vaginal discharges 4.55% , Missing 0.61%, Othersnonspecific 3.64% and Failure 0% agreeing with the study in South-south Nigeria of Port Harcourt as follows Menorrhagia/ irregular bleeding 30.3%, Amenorrhea 14% , Hypomenorrhea 2.0%, Dysmenorrhea 20.6%, Missing 5.3%, Expulsion 2.7%, Coital discomfort 2.4% ,Coital bleeding 0.6%, Accidental pregnancy 0.3%, Vaginal discharge 20.8%, Lower abdominal pain18.7% and PID 1.5%. However, the investigator is so concern with the association of IUD and menorrhagia. Therefore, the study aim to assess the menorrhagia associated with intra-uterine contraceptive device (Cut 380A) among women attending Idi-Ogungun Primary Health Care Centre, Ibadan North Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":333762,"journal":{"name":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21522/tijnr.2015.04.02.art001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is global use of IUD among women. It is seen as the safest and reversible family planning method compared to other methods. It is a wise choice for women within the sexual active period of life that are yet to commence or complete the number of children so desired and to also prevent unwanted pregnancy and the consequences of abortion. For the married couples yet to complete number of children desired it serves as a form of child spacing method of choice with high level reliability. Despite its safety and reversibility, it uses in developing country like America is low, estimated at 2% in 2002 (Mosher, 2004). Based on 2004 United Nations data, Eastern and Western Europe represent 4-5% of global IUD use. The reason for this low practice may be associated with its possible side effects like menorrhagia. However, WHO estimates that approximately 160 million women worldwide use IUDs today. China has an estimated two-thirds of these users, or 96 million. Only a small percentage of current users are in Eastern or Western Europe or other industrialized countries (10%). The remaining 24% are in developing countries other than China, concentrated in Vietnam, Egypt, Indonesia, India, and Uzbekistan, and Turkey – those six countries alone contain half of all users in developing countries excluding China. All developing countries fall into the following clusters, which show widely different determinants of use rates. They also help to identify programmatic reasons for greater or lesser uptake, (WHO, 2007). In Nigeria according to Dinwoke V, Okafor C, Eke A, (2015) in a study conducted in an Eastern Nigerian Teaching Hospital “the IUD was the most popular, being accepted by 56.7% of all clients” of all family methods. This was attributed to some women believe that using modern methods would endanger their health and future fertility. This concede with a study carried out in Port Harcourt, south-south Nigeriaby Enyindah C, Ojule J, Bassey G, indicating IUCD users in the range of 47 to 66% of contraceptive acceptors in different family planning centers and it is used longer than other reversible contraceptive methods. Though it is the safest reversible family planning method studies have associated it with the leading cause of menorrhagia among family planning user as shown in this study compared to other complications in Eastern Nigeria Teaching Hospital in which “No complication 83% 275, Menorrhagia/ irregular bleeding 23%, Abnormal vaginal discharges 4.55% , Missing 0.61%, Othersnonspecific 3.64% and Failure 0% agreeing with the study in South-south Nigeria of Port Harcourt as follows Menorrhagia/ irregular bleeding 30.3%, Amenorrhea 14% , Hypomenorrhea 2.0%, Dysmenorrhea 20.6%, Missing 5.3%, Expulsion 2.7%, Coital discomfort 2.4% ,Coital bleeding 0.6%, Accidental pregnancy 0.3%, Vaginal discharge 20.8%, Lower abdominal pain18.7% and PID 1.5%. However, the investigator is so concern with the association of IUD and menorrhagia. Therefore, the study aim to assess the menorrhagia associated with intra-uterine contraceptive device (Cut 380A) among women attending Idi-Ogungun Primary Health Care Centre, Ibadan North Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria.
在奥约州伊巴丹北部地方政府地区的idii - ogungun初级卫生保健中心就诊的妇女中与宫内避孕器(Cut 380a)有关的月经过多的评估
全球妇女都在使用宫内节育器。与其他方法相比,它被认为是最安全、可逆的计划生育方法。对于处于性生活活跃时期的妇女来说,这是一个明智的选择,她们尚未开始或完成所希望的生育数目,并防止意外怀孕和堕胎的后果。对于尚未完成生育数量的已婚夫妇来说,这是一种可靠性较高的生育间隔选择方法。尽管它的安全性和可逆性,但它在发展中国家如美国的使用率很低,估计在2002年为2% (Mosher, 2004)。根据2004年联合国的数据,东欧和西欧占全球宫内节育器使用的4-5%。这种做法低的原因可能与其可能的副作用有关,如月经过多。然而,据世卫组织估计,目前全世界约有1.6亿妇女使用宫内节育器。据估计,中国有三分之二的用户,即9600万人。目前只有一小部分用户在东欧或西欧或其他工业化国家(10%)。剩下的24%在中国以外的发展中国家,集中在越南、埃及、印度尼西亚、印度、乌兹别克斯坦和土耳其——仅这六个国家就占了除中国以外发展中国家所有用户的一半。所有发展中国家都属于下列类别,它们显示出使用率的决定因素差别很大。它们还有助于确定或多或少采用的规划原因(世卫组织,2007年)。在尼日利亚,根据dinwake V, Okafor C, Eke A(2015)在尼日利亚东部教学医院进行的一项研究,在所有家庭方法中,“宫内节育器是最受欢迎的,56.7%的客户接受”。这是由于一些妇女认为使用现代方法会危及她们的健康和未来的生育能力。Enyindah C, Ojule J, Bassey G在尼日利亚南南哈科特港进行的一项研究表明,在不同的计划生育中心,宫内节育器使用者占避孕药具接受者的47%至66%,并且使用时间比其他可逆避孕方法更长。虽然它是最安全的可逆计划生育方法,但研究表明,与尼日利亚东部教学医院的其他并发症相比,它与计划生育使用者中月经过多的主要原因有关,其中“无并发症83% 275,月经过多/不规则出血23%,阴道分泌物异常4.55%,漏血0.61%,无并发症。”其他非特异性3.64%和失败0%同意尼日利亚南南哈科特港的研究结果如下:月经多/不规则出血30.3%,闭经14%,月经少2.0%,痛经20.6%,缺血5.3%,排尿2.7%,性交不适2.4%,性交出血0.6%,意外怀孕0.3%,阴道分泌物20.8%,下腹痛18.7%,PID 1.5%。然而,研究者是如此关注宫内节育器和月经过多的关系。因此,该研究旨在评估在尼日利亚奥约州伊巴丹北部地方政府区idii - ogungun初级卫生保健中心就诊的妇女中与宫内避孕器(Cut 380A)相关的月经过多情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信