Comparison of Effects of Motor Relearning Programme and Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Functions in Post-Stroke Patients–A Randomized Control Trial

Anmol Narang, L. Arora, Reena Arora
{"title":"Comparison of Effects of Motor Relearning Programme and Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Functions in Post-Stroke Patients–A Randomized Control Trial","authors":"Anmol Narang, L. Arora, Reena Arora","doi":"10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.4.1817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effects of Motor Relearning Programme and Mirror Therapy on upper extremity functions in Post-Stroke patients.Design: Parallel group, randomized controlled trial.Settings: The present research investigation was carried out in the outpatient department (OPD) of the University College of Physiotherapy in Faridkot, as well as in the IPD and OPD of the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital in Faridkot, Punjab.Methods: A total of 45 post-stroke patients with upper limb disability were divided randomly into three equal groups comprises 15 patients each. Group A received Motor Relearning Programme (MRP) along with Conventional Physiotherapy (CPT), whereas Group B received Mirror Therapy (MT) along with CPT and Group C received CPT only. The total duration of intervention was 1 hour per session and frequency of 8 weeks, with 5 sessions per week.Main Outcome Measures: The outcome measures included were Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Chedoke Arm And Hand Activity Inventory Scale (CAHAI), Fugl Meyer Assessment of physical performance of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) Scale.Results: The present study revealed that all the parameters within the groups had significantly improved in the pre-intervention analysis. However, postintervention scores of all the parameters of Group A revealed considerable high improvement at a significant level of (p < 0.0001) when compared to the other two groups i.e., Group B and Group C.Conclusion: In light of the study’s findings, it is concluded that the MRP along with CPT is more effective than MT along with CPT and CPT alone.","PeriodicalId":113708,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.4.1817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of Motor Relearning Programme and Mirror Therapy on upper extremity functions in Post-Stroke patients.Design: Parallel group, randomized controlled trial.Settings: The present research investigation was carried out in the outpatient department (OPD) of the University College of Physiotherapy in Faridkot, as well as in the IPD and OPD of the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital in Faridkot, Punjab.Methods: A total of 45 post-stroke patients with upper limb disability were divided randomly into three equal groups comprises 15 patients each. Group A received Motor Relearning Programme (MRP) along with Conventional Physiotherapy (CPT), whereas Group B received Mirror Therapy (MT) along with CPT and Group C received CPT only. The total duration of intervention was 1 hour per session and frequency of 8 weeks, with 5 sessions per week.Main Outcome Measures: The outcome measures included were Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Chedoke Arm And Hand Activity Inventory Scale (CAHAI), Fugl Meyer Assessment of physical performance of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) Scale.Results: The present study revealed that all the parameters within the groups had significantly improved in the pre-intervention analysis. However, postintervention scores of all the parameters of Group A revealed considerable high improvement at a significant level of (p < 0.0001) when compared to the other two groups i.e., Group B and Group C.Conclusion: In light of the study’s findings, it is concluded that the MRP along with CPT is more effective than MT along with CPT and CPT alone.
运动再学习计划与镜像疗法对脑卒中后患者上肢功能影响的比较——一项随机对照试验
目的:比较运动再学习计划和镜像疗法对脑卒中后上肢功能的影响。设计:平行组,随机对照试验。环境:本研究调查是在法里德科特大学物理治疗学院的门诊部(OPD)以及旁遮普省法里德科特古鲁·戈宾德·辛格医学院和医院神经病学和神经外科的IPD和OPD进行的。方法:将45例脑卒中后上肢残疾患者随机分为3组,每组15例。A组接受运动再学习计划(MRP)和常规物理治疗(CPT),而B组接受镜像治疗(MT)和CPT, C组只接受CPT。总干预时间为每次1小时,干预频率为8周,每周5次。主要观察指标:包括运动评定量表(MAS)、Chedoke手臂和手活动量表(CAHAI)、Fugl Meyer上肢运动能力评定量表(FMA-UE)。结果:本研究显示,在干预前分析中,组内所有参数均有显著改善。然而,与B组和c组相比,A组所有参数的干预后评分显示出相当高的改善,显著水平(p < 0.0001)。结论:根据本研究的发现,MRP联合CPT比MT联合CPT和单独CPT更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信