Clinical Efficacy Of Combination Of Diltiazem And Lidocaine In Attenuating Hemodynamic Changes During Tracheal Intubation And Comparing The Response When They Are Used Alone.

Rekha Gupta, Mamta Dubey, B. Naithani, A. Bhargava
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy Of Combination Of Diltiazem And Lidocaine In Attenuating Hemodynamic Changes During Tracheal Intubation And Comparing The Response When They Are Used Alone.","authors":"Rekha Gupta, Mamta Dubey, B. Naithani, A. Bhargava","doi":"10.5580/2cbb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tracheal intubation produces transient hemodynamic pressor responses which may be unpredictable. Diltiazemlidocaine combination is hypothesized to attenuate these responses better that when they are used alone.Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of diltiazem-lidocaine combination in attenuating pressor response to tracheal intubation with lidocaine and diltiazem alone.Settings and Design : prospective double blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safetyMethods and Materials: 120 ASA grade II B and C were thus unaware of the drug given.Statistical analysis used : Demographic profiles were evaluated statistically using CHI square test. Changes in haemodynamic parameters were compared using paired t test within the group. Inter group comparison were done by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The attenuation of hemodynamic response occurred maximal in DL group followed by lidocaine and diltiazem group respectively ( P value< 0.001 till 5 minutes postintubation for BP and HR). Lidocaine controlled both heart rate and blood pressure better than Diltiazem as there was reflex tachycardia to some extent in D group due to reflex sympathoadrenal stimulation. Diltiazem-Lidocaine combination controlled both these parameter to optimal levels.Conclusions : The primary outcome of the study is that Diltiazem-Lidocaine combination is safe and effective in attenuating pressor response to tracheal intubation . We recommend its routine used before intubation","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2cbb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Tracheal intubation produces transient hemodynamic pressor responses which may be unpredictable. Diltiazemlidocaine combination is hypothesized to attenuate these responses better that when they are used alone.Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of diltiazem-lidocaine combination in attenuating pressor response to tracheal intubation with lidocaine and diltiazem alone.Settings and Design : prospective double blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safetyMethods and Materials: 120 ASA grade II B and C were thus unaware of the drug given.Statistical analysis used : Demographic profiles were evaluated statistically using CHI square test. Changes in haemodynamic parameters were compared using paired t test within the group. Inter group comparison were done by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The attenuation of hemodynamic response occurred maximal in DL group followed by lidocaine and diltiazem group respectively ( P value< 0.001 till 5 minutes postintubation for BP and HR). Lidocaine controlled both heart rate and blood pressure better than Diltiazem as there was reflex tachycardia to some extent in D group due to reflex sympathoadrenal stimulation. Diltiazem-Lidocaine combination controlled both these parameter to optimal levels.Conclusions : The primary outcome of the study is that Diltiazem-Lidocaine combination is safe and effective in attenuating pressor response to tracheal intubation . We recommend its routine used before intubation
地尔硫卓与利多卡因联用减轻气管插管血流动力学变化的临床疗效及单用效果比较。
背景:气管插管会产生短暂的血流动力学压力反应,这可能是不可预测的。假定地尔噻姆利多卡因联合使用比单独使用能更好地减轻这些反应。目的:比较地尔硫卓-利多卡因联合用药对利多卡因和地尔硫卓单用气管插管时降压反应的临床疗效和安全性。设置和设计:前瞻性双盲、随机临床试验的有效性和安全性方法和材料:120 ASA II级B和C级因此不知道给药。采用统计学分析:采用卡方检验对人口统计资料进行统计学评价。采用配对t检验比较组内血流动力学参数的变化。组间比较采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。结果:DL组血流动力学反应衰减最大,利多卡因组次之,地尔硫卓组次之(P值< 0.001)。由于D组由于反射性交感肾上腺刺激而出现一定程度的反射性心动过速,利多卡因对心率和血压的控制优于地尔硫卓。地尔硫卓-利多卡因联合用药将这两个参数控制在最佳水平。结论:本研究的主要结局是地尔硫卓-利多卡因联合用药对气管插管降压反应安全有效。我们建议在插管前常规使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信