Quality of life/subjective symptoms during beta-blocker treatment.

C Dahlöf
{"title":"Quality of life/subjective symptoms during beta-blocker treatment.","authors":"C Dahlöf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>beta-receptor antagonists have for many years been considered appropriate alternatives in the primary management of mild to moderate hypertension. Generally, they have been shown to be safe with a low frequency of serious side-effects. Among the predictable and usually doserelated side-effects are bradycardia, bronchospasm, hypotension, muscle fatigue and cold extremities. Examples of unexpected side-effects are gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and disturbed intestinal motility, skin reactions, sexual dysfunction, as well as effects related to the central nervous system (CNS) such as emotional disturbances. The CNS-related side-effects, the mechanisms of which are unclear, consist of subtle effects on general well-being, decreased initiative, a depressed frame of mind and disturbed sleep. Generally, however, beta-blockers in therapeutic dosages do not affect the qualitative functions of the brain. Thus, all beta-blockers on the market seem to have high benefit-risk ratio, but independent of their physiochemical properties and pharmacodynamic profile, they seem to cause side-effects to about the same extent. The results so far available have been obtained by primarily using objective methods. Further comparison has now been initiated using documented subjective methods to investigate whether the objectively documented differences are of any clinical relevance to the patient's quality of life. Although it cannot be claimed with certainty, nonselective beta-blockers seem to cause CNS-related side-effects to a greater extent than beta 1-selective blockers. Differences in the degree of hydrophilicity of the beta-blocker are apparently of no clinical relevance in this respect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77619,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement","volume":"1 ","pages":"73-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

beta-receptor antagonists have for many years been considered appropriate alternatives in the primary management of mild to moderate hypertension. Generally, they have been shown to be safe with a low frequency of serious side-effects. Among the predictable and usually doserelated side-effects are bradycardia, bronchospasm, hypotension, muscle fatigue and cold extremities. Examples of unexpected side-effects are gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and disturbed intestinal motility, skin reactions, sexual dysfunction, as well as effects related to the central nervous system (CNS) such as emotional disturbances. The CNS-related side-effects, the mechanisms of which are unclear, consist of subtle effects on general well-being, decreased initiative, a depressed frame of mind and disturbed sleep. Generally, however, beta-blockers in therapeutic dosages do not affect the qualitative functions of the brain. Thus, all beta-blockers on the market seem to have high benefit-risk ratio, but independent of their physiochemical properties and pharmacodynamic profile, they seem to cause side-effects to about the same extent. The results so far available have been obtained by primarily using objective methods. Further comparison has now been initiated using documented subjective methods to investigate whether the objectively documented differences are of any clinical relevance to the patient's quality of life. Although it cannot be claimed with certainty, nonselective beta-blockers seem to cause CNS-related side-effects to a greater extent than beta 1-selective blockers. Differences in the degree of hydrophilicity of the beta-blocker are apparently of no clinical relevance in this respect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

-受体阻滞剂治疗期间的生活质量/主观症状。
多年来,β受体拮抗剂一直被认为是轻度至中度高血压初级治疗的适当选择。一般来说,它们已被证明是安全的,严重副作用的频率很低。可预测且通常与剂量相关的副作用包括心动过缓、支气管痉挛、低血压、肌肉疲劳和四肢寒冷。意想不到的副作用的例子是胃肠道症状,如恶心和肠蠕动紊乱,皮肤反应,性功能障碍,以及与中枢神经系统(CNS)相关的影响,如情绪障碍。中枢神经系统相关的副作用,其机制尚不清楚,包括对一般健康的微妙影响,主动性下降,心境抑郁和睡眠紊乱。然而,一般来说,治疗剂量的-受体阻滞剂不会影响大脑的定性功能。因此,市场上所有的β受体阻滞剂似乎都有很高的收益-风险比,但独立于它们的物理化学性质和药效学特征,它们似乎在相同程度上引起副作用。迄今所得的结果主要是用客观方法得出的。进一步的比较现在已经开始使用记录的主观方法来调查客观记录的差异是否与患者的生活质量有任何临床相关性。虽然不能确定,但非选择性β -受体阻滞剂似乎比β - 1选择性受体阻滞剂在更大程度上引起中枢神经系统相关的副作用。β受体阻滞剂亲水性程度的差异在这方面显然没有临床相关性。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信