Jacques Maritain

In Memoriam, J. Maritain
{"title":"Jacques Maritain","authors":"In Memoriam, J. Maritain","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvrs8zr1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many of us Jacques Maritain embodied what hope remains for this dark world. His death in Toulouse on April 28, 1973, at the age of ninety, has left us bereft, as if he had been both our godfather and our godson. His important place in the history of human thought was established long before most of us knew him personally. For example, I was nineteen, in my first year at Princeton, when I first met him, and he was sixty-seven, recently retired from the French Embassy to the Holy See. We became close friends and remained so for twenty-four years. His association with this review was long and affectionate as was his association with the University of Notre Dame, which takes pride in its Jacques Maritain Center. But apart from these personal associations is the recognition due to his works of the mind and spirit. As long as reason was regarded as an adequate tool for knowing (and for knowing, among other things, other ways of knowing), the Western world generally preferred some form of the mind-matter dualism. Semitic religions, when they came to take up these modes of expression, discovered that they could subscribe to no other basic philosophy. Profiting from the chemistry of their own heresies, as well as by the discomfort which Islam had experienced in attempting to bring Aristotelian dualism into harmony with Koranic dualism, mediaeval Christianity sought a summation of theology in which no part of reality would be overlooked. Precisely such a summation is believed by many, including myself, to have been supplied by St. Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century. But just as the theological content of this particular summation, the systematized expression of one infinitely rich, indeed inexhaustible, Divine Revelation, was meant to germinate further speculation, so was its philosophical content. I know of no mind that examined the philosophical content of the Thomistic synthesis with greater precision, interpreted it with greater probity, advanced its growth with greater genius, than the mind of Jacques Maritain. There is a timelessness about his work simply because it bears the imprint of the whole history of thought. To attack or defend it seriously is to attack or defend any of many categories: the classical","PeriodicalId":325198,"journal":{"name":"Grace, Predestination, and the Permission of Sin","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grace, Predestination, and the Permission of Sin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvrs8zr1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For many of us Jacques Maritain embodied what hope remains for this dark world. His death in Toulouse on April 28, 1973, at the age of ninety, has left us bereft, as if he had been both our godfather and our godson. His important place in the history of human thought was established long before most of us knew him personally. For example, I was nineteen, in my first year at Princeton, when I first met him, and he was sixty-seven, recently retired from the French Embassy to the Holy See. We became close friends and remained so for twenty-four years. His association with this review was long and affectionate as was his association with the University of Notre Dame, which takes pride in its Jacques Maritain Center. But apart from these personal associations is the recognition due to his works of the mind and spirit. As long as reason was regarded as an adequate tool for knowing (and for knowing, among other things, other ways of knowing), the Western world generally preferred some form of the mind-matter dualism. Semitic religions, when they came to take up these modes of expression, discovered that they could subscribe to no other basic philosophy. Profiting from the chemistry of their own heresies, as well as by the discomfort which Islam had experienced in attempting to bring Aristotelian dualism into harmony with Koranic dualism, mediaeval Christianity sought a summation of theology in which no part of reality would be overlooked. Precisely such a summation is believed by many, including myself, to have been supplied by St. Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century. But just as the theological content of this particular summation, the systematized expression of one infinitely rich, indeed inexhaustible, Divine Revelation, was meant to germinate further speculation, so was its philosophical content. I know of no mind that examined the philosophical content of the Thomistic synthesis with greater precision, interpreted it with greater probity, advanced its growth with greater genius, than the mind of Jacques Maritain. There is a timelessness about his work simply because it bears the imprint of the whole history of thought. To attack or defend it seriously is to attack or defend any of many categories: the classical
附带着
对我们许多人来说,雅克·马里坦代表了这个黑暗世界的希望。他于1973年4月28日在图卢兹去世,享年90岁,留给我们的是失去的东西,仿佛他既是我们的教父又是我们的教子。他在人类思想史上的重要地位早在我们大多数人认识他之前就确立了。例如,我第一次见到他时,我19岁,在普林斯顿大学的第一年,他67岁,刚从法国驻罗马教廷大使馆退休。我们成了亲密的朋友,并保持了24年。他与这篇评论的关系长久而深情,就像他与圣母大学的关系一样,圣母大学以其雅克·马里坦中心而自豪。但除了这些个人的联想之外,人们还对他的作品的思想和精神给予了认可。只要理性被认为是认知的适当工具(以及认知的其他方式),西方世界通常更倾向于某种形式的心灵-物质二元论。闪米特宗教,当他们开始接受这些表达方式时,发现他们不能认同其他的基本哲学。从中受益于他们自己的异端的化学反应,以及伊斯兰教在试图将亚里士多德的二元论与古兰经的二元论相协调时所经历的不适,中世纪的基督教寻求一种神学的总和,其中没有任何现实的部分会被忽视。许多人,包括我自己,都相信圣托马斯·阿奎那在13世纪提供了这样一个总结。但是,正如这个特殊的总结的神学内容,这个无限丰富的,实际上是无穷无尽的神的启示的系统表达,是为了激发进一步的思考一样,它的哲学内容也是如此。我知道没有人比雅克·马里坦更精确地研究了托马斯主义综合的哲学内容,更诚实地解释了它,更天才地推动了它的发展。他的作品有一种永恒,因为它带有整个思想史的印记。认真地攻击或捍卫它,就是攻击或捍卫许多类别中的任何一个:古典文学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信