What’s the Future for the House of Lords?

B. Williams
{"title":"What’s the Future for the House of Lords?","authors":"B. Williams","doi":"10.1177/20419058231167266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n December 2022, Sir Keir Starmer declared that the House of Lords is ‘not capable of being defended’. The Labour leader’s intervention thrust the chamber firmly into the political spotlight ahead of the next general election. Proposals to reform this archaic institution are regular occurrences in the political cycle, and Starmer’s plans provoked an unsurprising Conservative reaction. But what is the current status of the House of Lords, and how likely is reform? As the unelected upper chamber of the British Parliament, the House of Lords has traditionally been pivotal to the country’s constitutional structure. Dating back to medieval times and first formally noted in the late 13th century, the Lords has had an eventful and often controversial history. In wholly functional terms, its ‘revising’ legislative role within a bicameral system is viewed by its advocates as enhancing the smooth legislative workings of Parliament. Since 1911 its undemocratic nature – members are not directly elected by popular franchise – has made it formally inferior in terms of power compared to the House of Commons, but constitutional conservatives ardently hold that it continues to play a vital parliamentary role, albeit within the context of a widely accepted Commons ascendancy. Others however, have been more critical about the purpose that the Lords serves. For example, in 1962 Tony Benn, while campaigning to disown his own hereditary peerage, alluded to what he perceived as What’s the Future for the House of Lords?","PeriodicalId":401121,"journal":{"name":"Political Insight","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20419058231167266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I n December 2022, Sir Keir Starmer declared that the House of Lords is ‘not capable of being defended’. The Labour leader’s intervention thrust the chamber firmly into the political spotlight ahead of the next general election. Proposals to reform this archaic institution are regular occurrences in the political cycle, and Starmer’s plans provoked an unsurprising Conservative reaction. But what is the current status of the House of Lords, and how likely is reform? As the unelected upper chamber of the British Parliament, the House of Lords has traditionally been pivotal to the country’s constitutional structure. Dating back to medieval times and first formally noted in the late 13th century, the Lords has had an eventful and often controversial history. In wholly functional terms, its ‘revising’ legislative role within a bicameral system is viewed by its advocates as enhancing the smooth legislative workings of Parliament. Since 1911 its undemocratic nature – members are not directly elected by popular franchise – has made it formally inferior in terms of power compared to the House of Commons, but constitutional conservatives ardently hold that it continues to play a vital parliamentary role, albeit within the context of a widely accepted Commons ascendancy. Others however, have been more critical about the purpose that the Lords serves. For example, in 1962 Tony Benn, while campaigning to disown his own hereditary peerage, alluded to what he perceived as What’s the Future for the House of Lords?
英国上议院的未来是什么?
2022年12月,凯尔·斯塔默爵士宣称,上议院“无法被捍卫”。工党领袖的干预使英国议会在下届大选前成为政治焦点。改革这一陈旧制度的提议在政治周期中屡见不鲜,而斯塔默的计划激起了保守党的反应,这并不令人意外。但是上议院目前的状况如何,改革的可能性有多大?作为未经选举产生的英国议会上院,上议院历来对英国的宪法结构至关重要。上院的历史可以追溯到中世纪,并在13世纪晚期首次被正式提及,它经历了一段多事且经常充满争议的历史。从整体功能上讲,其在两院制中的“修订”立法角色被其支持者视为加强议会立法工作的顺利进行。自1911年以来,它的非民主性质——成员不是由民众直接选举产生的——使其在权力方面正式逊于下议院,但宪法保守派热烈地认为,它继续发挥着至关重要的议会作用,尽管是在被广泛接受的下议院优势的背景下。然而,其他人对上院服务的目的持更为批评的态度。例如,1962年,托尼·本恩(Tony Benn)在争取放弃自己的世袭贵族身份时,提到了他所认为的“上议院的未来是什么?”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信