Cultural Brand as a Manifestation of Contemporaneity in the Management Theory

Marcin Komańda
{"title":"Cultural Brand as a Manifestation of Contemporaneity in the Management Theory","authors":"Marcin Komańda","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2474962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the point of view of the purpose of this paper its introduction should draw attention to the most commonly recognized aspect of contemporaneity (also referred to as postmodernism or late modernity) in economics, namely the process of globalisation [Kostera 1996, pp. 22-25] for it is necessary to dispose of the still persisting common belief that the current process of globalisation concerns, first and foremost, the expansion of business activity from a geographic perspective. It is not entirely true. Globalisation understood as a phenomenon of territorial expansion occurred together with geographic discoveries and conquering of the so called overseas territories by European powers. It was then when spreading trade relations and flow of people all around the globe became popular. It is also a fact that globalisation from the perspective of geographic expansion of business activity in the 20th century displayed twofold acceleration. The first acceleration was observed after the end of World War Two when the markets of former European colonies were opened up, whereas the second one -- at the end of the 20th century along with the collapse of the Eastern Bloc. Therefore globalisation as a socio-economic phenomenon is not characteristic only for recent times.However, nowadays another character of globalisation is being mindfully suggested as well. Liberalization and integration of markets of goods, services and capital are described in this context. Liberalization and integration cause, in turn, the formation of a new institutional order which favours flow of products, services and money [Rymarczyk 2004, p. 19]. In fact, territorial expansion of business activity itself is something that has been to a large extent completed. However, its quality has become its major problem. This new economic view of the process of globalisation is also closely accompanied by globalisation from the social perspective.","PeriodicalId":420844,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Economic & Financial Issues (Topic)","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Economic & Financial Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2474962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the point of view of the purpose of this paper its introduction should draw attention to the most commonly recognized aspect of contemporaneity (also referred to as postmodernism or late modernity) in economics, namely the process of globalisation [Kostera 1996, pp. 22-25] for it is necessary to dispose of the still persisting common belief that the current process of globalisation concerns, first and foremost, the expansion of business activity from a geographic perspective. It is not entirely true. Globalisation understood as a phenomenon of territorial expansion occurred together with geographic discoveries and conquering of the so called overseas territories by European powers. It was then when spreading trade relations and flow of people all around the globe became popular. It is also a fact that globalisation from the perspective of geographic expansion of business activity in the 20th century displayed twofold acceleration. The first acceleration was observed after the end of World War Two when the markets of former European colonies were opened up, whereas the second one -- at the end of the 20th century along with the collapse of the Eastern Bloc. Therefore globalisation as a socio-economic phenomenon is not characteristic only for recent times.However, nowadays another character of globalisation is being mindfully suggested as well. Liberalization and integration of markets of goods, services and capital are described in this context. Liberalization and integration cause, in turn, the formation of a new institutional order which favours flow of products, services and money [Rymarczyk 2004, p. 19]. In fact, territorial expansion of business activity itself is something that has been to a large extent completed. However, its quality has become its major problem. This new economic view of the process of globalisation is also closely accompanied by globalisation from the social perspective.
文化品牌在管理理论中的时代性表现
从本文的目的来看,它的介绍应该引起人们对经济学中当代性(也被称为后现代主义或晚期现代性)最普遍认可的方面的关注,即全球化的过程[Kostera 1996,第22-25页],因为有必要处理仍然坚持的共同信念,即当前的全球化过程首先是从地理角度考虑的商业活动的扩展。这并不完全正确。全球化被理解为一种领土扩张现象,与地理发现和欧洲列强对所谓海外领土的征服一起发生。那时,在全球范围内传播贸易关系和人员流动变得流行起来。从商业活动的地理扩张角度来看,全球化在20世纪表现出两倍的加速,这也是一个事实。第一次加速发生在第二次世界大战结束后,当时前欧洲殖民地的市场开放,而第二次加速发生在20世纪末,随着东欧集团的崩溃。因此,全球化作为一种社会经济现象,不仅是最近的特征。然而,如今全球化的另一个特征也被谨慎地提出。货物、服务和资本市场的自由化和一体化是在这种情况下描述的。自由化和一体化反过来又形成了有利于产品、服务和资金流动的新制度秩序[Rymarczyk 2004, p. 19]。事实上,企业活动的地域扩张本身就是一件在很大程度上已经完成的事情。然而,其质量已成为其主要问题。这种对全球化进程的新的经济观点也与社会视角的全球化密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信