Clinical Results Over Time for Unilateral versus Bilateral Simultaneous Short Scarf Osteotomy

C. Jeong, I. Park, J. Chung
{"title":"Clinical Results Over Time for Unilateral versus Bilateral Simultaneous Short Scarf Osteotomy","authors":"C. Jeong, I. Park, J. Chung","doi":"10.14193/jkfas.2019.23.4.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CC This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright 2019 Korean Foot and Ankle Society. All rights reserved. c Purpose: This study compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of simultaneous bilateral short scarf osteotomy with those of unilateral short scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus patients. Materials and Methods: The authors undertook a retrospective chart and radiographic review between January 2015 and June 2017 to identify 15 patients (30 cases, group A) who underwent a simultaneous bilateral short scarf osteotomy. The patients were matched with 30 patients (30 cases, group B) with a unilateral short scarf osteotomy. No significant preoperative differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, gender, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score, and radiographic parameters. The clinical and radiographic follow-up was carried out at three months and one year. Results: Hallux valgus angles in groups A and B were reduced from the mean preoperative values of 32.5° and 34.7° to 12.5° and 12.2° at 12 months, respectively. The first-second intermetatarsal angles in groups A and B were also reduced from the mean preoperative values of 14.2° and 16.5° to 7.4° and 7.3° at 12 months, respectively. No significant inter-group differences in radiographic outcomes were observed. After three months, the patients in group A reported significantly worse mean pain and functional scores than group B. The mean AOFAS hallux score was higher in group B at the three-month follow-up, but this difference disappeared at the one-year followup. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral surgery can be offered to patients with a hallux valgus deformity requiring correction. On the other hand, they should be informed of the long recovery period.","PeriodicalId":403749,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14193/jkfas.2019.23.4.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CC This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright 2019 Korean Foot and Ankle Society. All rights reserved. c Purpose: This study compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of simultaneous bilateral short scarf osteotomy with those of unilateral short scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus patients. Materials and Methods: The authors undertook a retrospective chart and radiographic review between January 2015 and June 2017 to identify 15 patients (30 cases, group A) who underwent a simultaneous bilateral short scarf osteotomy. The patients were matched with 30 patients (30 cases, group B) with a unilateral short scarf osteotomy. No significant preoperative differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, gender, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score, and radiographic parameters. The clinical and radiographic follow-up was carried out at three months and one year. Results: Hallux valgus angles in groups A and B were reduced from the mean preoperative values of 32.5° and 34.7° to 12.5° and 12.2° at 12 months, respectively. The first-second intermetatarsal angles in groups A and B were also reduced from the mean preoperative values of 14.2° and 16.5° to 7.4° and 7.3° at 12 months, respectively. No significant inter-group differences in radiographic outcomes were observed. After three months, the patients in group A reported significantly worse mean pain and functional scores than group B. The mean AOFAS hallux score was higher in group B at the three-month follow-up, but this difference disappeared at the one-year followup. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral surgery can be offered to patients with a hallux valgus deformity requiring correction. On the other hand, they should be informed of the long recovery period.
单侧与双侧同步短围巾截骨术的临床结果
这是一篇在知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0)条款下发布的开放获取文章,该许可允许在任何媒体上不受限制的非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原创作品。版权所有2019韩国足踝协会。版权所有。c目的:本研究比较双侧短截骨术与单侧短截骨术治疗拇外翻患者的影像学和临床结果。材料和方法:2015年1月至2017年6月,作者对15例(30例,a组)同时行双侧短围巾截骨术的患者进行回顾性图表和x线检查。对照组30例(B组)行单侧短围巾截骨术。术前两组患者在年龄、性别、美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)拇趾评分和影像学参数方面均无显著差异。分别于3个月和1年进行临床和影像学随访。结果:A组和B组的拇外翻角分别从术前的32.5°和34.7°降低到12个月时的12.5°和12.2°。A组和B组的第一、第二跖骨间角也分别从术前14.2°和16.5°的平均值降低到12个月时的7.4°和7.3°。组间放射学结果无显著差异。3个月后,A组患者报告的平均疼痛和功能评分明显低于B组。3个月随访时,B组患者的平均AOFAS拇趾评分较高,但在1年随访时,这种差异消失。结论:双侧同时手术治疗拇外翻畸形是可行的。另一方面,他们应该被告知恢复期很长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信