Can Structural Models Price Default Risk? New Evidence from Bond and Credit Derivative Markets

Hedging & Risk Pub Date : 2005-01-27 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.637042
Jan Ericsson, Joel Reneby, Hao Wang
{"title":"Can Structural Models Price Default Risk? New Evidence from Bond and Credit Derivative Markets","authors":"Jan Ericsson, Joel Reneby, Hao Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.637042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a set of structural models, we evaluate the price of default protection for a sample of US corporations. In contrast to previous evidence from corporate bond data, credit default swap (CDS) premia are not systematically underestimated. In fact, one of our studied models has little difficulty on average in predicting their level. For robustness, we perform the same exercise for bond spreads by the same issuers on the same trading date. As expected, bond spreads relative to the treasury curve are systematically underestimated. This is not the case when the swap curve is used as a benchmark, suggesting that previously documented underestimation results may be sensitive to the choice of risk-free rate.","PeriodicalId":122936,"journal":{"name":"Hedging & Risk","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"107","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hedging & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.637042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 107

Abstract

Using a set of structural models, we evaluate the price of default protection for a sample of US corporations. In contrast to previous evidence from corporate bond data, credit default swap (CDS) premia are not systematically underestimated. In fact, one of our studied models has little difficulty on average in predicting their level. For robustness, we perform the same exercise for bond spreads by the same issuers on the same trading date. As expected, bond spreads relative to the treasury curve are systematically underestimated. This is not the case when the swap curve is used as a benchmark, suggesting that previously documented underestimation results may be sensitive to the choice of risk-free rate.
结构模型能反映违约风险吗?来自债券和信用衍生品市场的新证据
使用一组结构模型,我们评估了美国公司样本的违约保护价格。与之前来自公司债券数据的证据相反,信用违约掉期(CDS)的溢价并未被系统性低估。事实上,我们研究的一个模型在预测它们的水平方面平均没有什么困难。为了保证稳健性,我们对同一发行者在同一交易日的债券息差进行了相同的练习。正如预期的那样,相对于国债曲线的债券息差被系统性地低估了。当将掉期曲线作为基准时,情况并非如此,这表明先前记录的低估结果可能对无风险利率的选择很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信