The CFPB's Arbitration Rule: The Road Ahead

David L. Noll
{"title":"The CFPB's Arbitration Rule: The Road Ahead","authors":"David L. Noll","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2873866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In May 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that it intended to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to bar consumer financial companies from invoking pre-dispute arbitration agreements to block consumer class actions. This comment considers the most serious threats to the Bureau's arbitration rule and concludes that its prospects are bad. Under Trump, banks and credit card companies will continue to avoid class-action litigation by mandating individual arbitration and there is little that supporters of the Bureau's rule can do about it.","PeriodicalId":113747,"journal":{"name":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2873866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In May 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that it intended to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to bar consumer financial companies from invoking pre-dispute arbitration agreements to block consumer class actions. This comment considers the most serious threats to the Bureau's arbitration rule and concludes that its prospects are bad. Under Trump, banks and credit card companies will continue to avoid class-action litigation by mandating individual arbitration and there is little that supporters of the Bureau's rule can do about it.
CFPB的仲裁规则:前进的道路
2016年5月,美国消费者金融保护局(Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)宣布,它打算根据《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)行使权力,禁止消费金融公司援引争议前仲裁协议来阻止消费者集体诉讼。本评论审议了对主席团仲裁规则的最严重威胁,并得出结论认为其前景不妙。在特朗普的领导下,银行和信用卡公司将继续通过强制个人仲裁来避免集体诉讼,而联邦调查局规则的支持者对此几乎无能为力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信