Evaluation of population partitioning schemes in bayesian classifier EDAs: estimation of distribution algoithms

David Wallin, C. Ryan
{"title":"Evaluation of population partitioning schemes in bayesian classifier EDAs: estimation of distribution algoithms","authors":"David Wallin, C. Ryan","doi":"10.1145/1569901.1569966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several algorithms within the field of Evolutionary Computation have been proposed that effectively turn optimisation problems into supervised learning tasks. Typically such hybrid algorithms partition their populations into three subsets, high performing, low performing and mediocre, where the subset containing mediocre candidates is discarded from the phase of model construction. In this paper we will empirically compare this traditional partitioning scheme against two alternative schemes on a range of difficult problems from the literature. The experiments will show that at small population sizes, using the whole population is often a better approach than the traditional partitioning scheme, but partitioning around the midpoint and ignoring candidates at the extremes, is often even better.","PeriodicalId":193093,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1569901.1569966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several algorithms within the field of Evolutionary Computation have been proposed that effectively turn optimisation problems into supervised learning tasks. Typically such hybrid algorithms partition their populations into three subsets, high performing, low performing and mediocre, where the subset containing mediocre candidates is discarded from the phase of model construction. In this paper we will empirically compare this traditional partitioning scheme against two alternative schemes on a range of difficult problems from the literature. The experiments will show that at small population sizes, using the whole population is often a better approach than the traditional partitioning scheme, but partitioning around the midpoint and ignoring candidates at the extremes, is often even better.
贝叶斯分类器EDAs中总体划分方案的评价:分布算法的估计
进化计算领域已经提出了几种算法,有效地将优化问题转化为监督学习任务。通常,这种混合算法将它们的种群划分为三个子集,高性能,低性能和平庸,其中包含平庸候选者的子集从模型构建阶段被丢弃。在本文中,我们将经验比较这一传统的划分方案与两个备选方案的一系列难题,从文献。实验将表明,在较小的人口规模下,使用整个人口通常比传统的划分方案更好,但围绕中点进行划分并忽略极端的候选者通常会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信