Voice Handicap Index Severity Grading: Do We Need to Recalibrate it for the Indian Population?

U. Menon, S. Venugopal, Deepu Chirayil, R. Bhaskaran
{"title":"Voice Handicap Index Severity Grading: Do We Need to Recalibrate it for the Indian Population?","authors":"U. Menon, S. Venugopal, Deepu Chirayil, R. Bhaskaran","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Background: The voice handicap index (VHI 30), used to assess patients’ perception of the severity of their voice disorder, is a standard evaluation parameter in dysphonia cases. The score has conventionally set cut-offs to grade the severity. The latter will be effective only if there are appropriate responses from the patient. If not, then there may be a need to re-set the cut-offs. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare and correlate laryngeal findings and voice analysis parameters with the VHI scores, to see if there is a need to recalibrate the normatives. Materials and methods: Document analysis of VHI forms of patients who have visited and undergone treatment at the voice clinic at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences. The VHI scores were correlated with the laryngeal findings and voice analysis parameters. Results: As much as 64% of patients were in the normal and mild grades of the VHI score. No statistically significant correlation could be found between VHI scores and Jitter and Shimmer, by any of the attempted methods, although there was a clinical correlation in some cases. The validity of the present cut-offs of VHI severity could not be assessed. Conclusion: There is a need to look at VHI scoring patterns in other population groups in India, as also to consider better statistical methods to approach the problem.","PeriodicalId":258448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ab s t r Ac t Background: The voice handicap index (VHI 30), used to assess patients’ perception of the severity of their voice disorder, is a standard evaluation parameter in dysphonia cases. The score has conventionally set cut-offs to grade the severity. The latter will be effective only if there are appropriate responses from the patient. If not, then there may be a need to re-set the cut-offs. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare and correlate laryngeal findings and voice analysis parameters with the VHI scores, to see if there is a need to recalibrate the normatives. Materials and methods: Document analysis of VHI forms of patients who have visited and undergone treatment at the voice clinic at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences. The VHI scores were correlated with the laryngeal findings and voice analysis parameters. Results: As much as 64% of patients were in the normal and mild grades of the VHI score. No statistically significant correlation could be found between VHI scores and Jitter and Shimmer, by any of the attempted methods, although there was a clinical correlation in some cases. The validity of the present cut-offs of VHI severity could not be assessed. Conclusion: There is a need to look at VHI scoring patterns in other population groups in India, as also to consider better statistical methods to approach the problem.
声音障碍指数严重程度分级:我们需要为印度人口重新校准它吗?
背景:语音障碍指数(VHI 30)用于评价患者对其语音障碍严重程度的感知,是语音障碍病例的标准评价参数。按照惯例,该分数会设置一个临界值来划分严重程度。后者只有在患者有适当反应的情况下才有效。如果没有,那么可能需要重新设置截止。目的:本研究的目的是比较和关联喉部发现和声音分析参数与VHI评分,看看是否有必要重新校准规范。材料和方法:对在阿姆里塔医学研究所语音诊所就诊并接受治疗的患者的VHI表格进行文献分析。VHI评分与喉部表现和声音分析参数相关。结果:高达64%的患者处于VHI评分的正常和轻度等级。尽管在某些情况下存在临床相关性,但通过任何尝试的方法都无法发现VHI评分与Jitter和Shimmer之间存在统计学上显著的相关性。目前的VHI严重程度临界值的有效性无法评估。结论:有必要看看印度其他人口群体的VHI评分模式,也考虑更好的统计方法来解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信