Tarikh Miladi Sepadan bagi Kenampakan Hilal Ramadan Dalam Hadis Kurayb RA Berkaitan Matla’

Muhamad Zakuwa Rodzali, S. Man
{"title":"Tarikh Miladi Sepadan bagi Kenampakan Hilal Ramadan Dalam Hadis Kurayb RA Berkaitan Matla’","authors":"Muhamad Zakuwa Rodzali, S. Man","doi":"10.22452/fiqh.vol18no1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ḥadīth Kurayb RA about him being sent by Umm al-Fadl from Madīnah to Sham, is one of the main chronicles of the Shāfi‘i School regarding the outcomes of rukyah hilal which is applicable to the same maṭla’ only. This ḥadīth is narrated in most ḥadīth books including Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Sunan alTirmidhī, Abū Dāwud, al-Nasā’ī, al-Bayhaqī, alDaruqutnī, Musnad Ahmad bin Ḥanbāl and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah, the isnads are authentic and the narrators are thiqah. The reality today is that the appreciation of the ḥadīth is difficult to fulfil; although the distance from Madinah to Sham is only around 1055 kilometers it is considered ineffectual to employ the outcomes of rukyah in Sham. However, it is important to have a matching Gregorian date on the appearance of the Ramadan hilal so that the date stated in the ḥadīth could be confirmed. Thus, an analysis from the historical and astronomical perspective was conducted to determine the relevant Gregorian dates. The results of the historical analysis revealed that Kurayb’s proclamation could not have occurred earlier than 19H/640M in view of the presence of Muawiyah in Sham and could not be later than 36H/657M as the last event involving Umm al-Fadl recorded by some historians occurred in that year. The results of the data analysis revealed that the Gregorian date in the ḥadīth that corresponded to the appearance of the crescent moon, April 4, 653M (Thursday) was used to determine the beginning of Ramadan 32H/653M based on the parameters of the position of the moon including age, altitude, elongation, arc of vision (ARCV) and width (W) all of which were larger at Sham than at Madīnah during the rukyah evening, hence it could have been sighted in Sham and not Madīnah. It is hoped that this study could provide a clearer understanding to the community on the background of events in the ḥadīth, hence, the proposal for the potential implementation of a more global hijri calendar can be accepted.","PeriodicalId":145468,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Fiqh","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Fiqh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol18no1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ḥadīth Kurayb RA about him being sent by Umm al-Fadl from Madīnah to Sham, is one of the main chronicles of the Shāfi‘i School regarding the outcomes of rukyah hilal which is applicable to the same maṭla’ only. This ḥadīth is narrated in most ḥadīth books including Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Sunan alTirmidhī, Abū Dāwud, al-Nasā’ī, al-Bayhaqī, alDaruqutnī, Musnad Ahmad bin Ḥanbāl and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah, the isnads are authentic and the narrators are thiqah. The reality today is that the appreciation of the ḥadīth is difficult to fulfil; although the distance from Madinah to Sham is only around 1055 kilometers it is considered ineffectual to employ the outcomes of rukyah in Sham. However, it is important to have a matching Gregorian date on the appearance of the Ramadan hilal so that the date stated in the ḥadīth could be confirmed. Thus, an analysis from the historical and astronomical perspective was conducted to determine the relevant Gregorian dates. The results of the historical analysis revealed that Kurayb’s proclamation could not have occurred earlier than 19H/640M in view of the presence of Muawiyah in Sham and could not be later than 36H/657M as the last event involving Umm al-Fadl recorded by some historians occurred in that year. The results of the data analysis revealed that the Gregorian date in the ḥadīth that corresponded to the appearance of the crescent moon, April 4, 653M (Thursday) was used to determine the beginning of Ramadan 32H/653M based on the parameters of the position of the moon including age, altitude, elongation, arc of vision (ARCV) and width (W) all of which were larger at Sham than at Madīnah during the rukyah evening, hence it could have been sighted in Sham and not Madīnah. It is hoped that this study could provide a clearer understanding to the community on the background of events in the ḥadīth, hence, the proposal for the potential implementation of a more global hijri calendar can be accepted.
Ḥadīth Kurayb RA关于他被Umm al-Fadl从mad送到Sham,是Shāfi ' i学派关于rukyah hilal结果的主要编年史之一,这只适用于maṭla '。这ḥadīth在大多数ḥadīth书籍中都有叙述,包括Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Sunan altirmidh ā, abir ā Dāwud, al- nasha ā, al- bayhaq ā, al daruqutni ā, Musnad Ahmad bin Ḥanbāl和Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah, isnads是真实的,叙述者是thiqah。今天的现实是,ḥadīth的升值很难实现;虽然麦地那到沙姆的距离只有大约1055公里,但在沙姆使用rukyah的结果被认为是无效的。然而,重要的是要在斋月希拉勒的出现上有一个匹配的公历日期,以便ḥadīth中所述的日期可以得到确认。因此,从历史和天文学的角度进行了分析,以确定相关的格里高利历日期。历史分析的结果显示,Kurayb的公告不可能早于19H/640M,因为穆阿维耶在沙姆存在,也不可能晚于36H/657M,因为一些历史学家记录的涉及乌姆法德尔的最后事件发生在这一年。数据分析的结果显示公历日期公元ḥīth与新月的出现,4月4日653(星期四)是用来确定斋月的开始32 h / 653 m基于月球的位置的参数,包括年龄,高度,伸长,电弧的愿景(ARCV)和宽度(W)所有的大骗局比疯狂īrukyah期间不晚上,因此它可以被发现在虚假的,而不是疯狂的ī不。希望这项研究能够让社区对ḥadīth事件的背景有更清晰的了解,因此,可能实施更全球化的伊斯兰教历的建议可以被接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信