Comparison of turbulence mitigation algorithms

Stephen T. Kozacik, Aaron L. Paolini, J. Bonnett, E. Kelmelis
{"title":"Comparison of turbulence mitigation algorithms","authors":"Stephen T. Kozacik, Aaron L. Paolini, J. Bonnett, E. Kelmelis","doi":"10.1117/12.2225617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When capturing image data over long distances (0.5 km and above), images are often degraded by atmospheric turbulence, especially when imaging paths are close to the ground or in hot environments. These issues manifest as time-varying scintillation and warping effects that decrease the effective resolution of the sensor and reduce actionable intelligence. In recent years, several image processing approaches to turbulence mitigation have shown promise. Each of these algorithms have different computational requirements, usability demands, and degrees of independence from camera sensors. They also produce different degrees of enhancement when applied to turbulent imagery. Additionally, some of these algorithms are applicable to real-time operational scenarios while others may only be suitable for post-processing workflows. EM Photonics has been developing image-processing-based turbulence mitigation technology since 2005 as a part of our ATCOM [1] image processing suite. In this paper we will compare techniques from the literature with our commercially available real-time GPU accelerated turbulence mitigation software suite, as well as in-house research algorithms. These comparisons will be made using real, experimentally-obtained data for a variety of different conditions, including varying optical hardware, imaging range, subjects, and turbulence conditions. Comparison metrics will include image quality, video latency, computational complexity, and potential for real-time operation.","PeriodicalId":222501,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Defense + Security","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Defense + Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2225617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

When capturing image data over long distances (0.5 km and above), images are often degraded by atmospheric turbulence, especially when imaging paths are close to the ground or in hot environments. These issues manifest as time-varying scintillation and warping effects that decrease the effective resolution of the sensor and reduce actionable intelligence. In recent years, several image processing approaches to turbulence mitigation have shown promise. Each of these algorithms have different computational requirements, usability demands, and degrees of independence from camera sensors. They also produce different degrees of enhancement when applied to turbulent imagery. Additionally, some of these algorithms are applicable to real-time operational scenarios while others may only be suitable for post-processing workflows. EM Photonics has been developing image-processing-based turbulence mitigation technology since 2005 as a part of our ATCOM [1] image processing suite. In this paper we will compare techniques from the literature with our commercially available real-time GPU accelerated turbulence mitigation software suite, as well as in-house research algorithms. These comparisons will be made using real, experimentally-obtained data for a variety of different conditions, including varying optical hardware, imaging range, subjects, and turbulence conditions. Comparison metrics will include image quality, video latency, computational complexity, and potential for real-time operation.
湍流缓解算法的比较
在远距离(0.5公里及以上)捕获图像数据时,图像通常会受到大气湍流的影响,特别是当成像路径接近地面或在炎热环境中时。这些问题表现为时变闪烁和翘曲效应,降低了传感器的有效分辨率,降低了可操作的智能。近年来,一些图像处理方法已经显示出缓解湍流的希望。每种算法都有不同的计算要求、可用性要求和与相机传感器的独立程度。当应用于湍流图像时,它们也会产生不同程度的增强。此外,其中一些算法适用于实时操作场景,而其他算法可能仅适用于后处理工作流。EM Photonics自2005年以来一直在开发基于图像处理的湍流缓解技术,作为我们ATCOM[1]图像处理套件的一部分。在本文中,我们将比较文献中的技术与我们市售的实时GPU加速湍流缓解软件套件以及内部研究算法。这些比较将使用各种不同条件下的真实实验数据进行,包括不同的光学硬件、成像范围、对象和湍流条件。比较指标将包括图像质量、视频延迟、计算复杂性和实时操作的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信