The Right to Freedom of Religion and Jurisdictional Conflicts in Malaysia

Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil, Wan Naim Wan Naim Wan Mansor, Azril Mohd Amin
{"title":"The Right to Freedom of Religion and Jurisdictional Conflicts in Malaysia","authors":"Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil, Wan Naim Wan Naim Wan Mansor, Azril Mohd Amin","doi":"10.17576/sinergi.0301.2023.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Malaysia, the Federal Constitution provides significant legal protections for religious freedom. Article 11 guarantees the right to practice and propagate one's religious beliefs freely, except for restrictions on propagation concerning Muslims under federal law. Furthermore, Islam holds a unique position in the country, according to Article 3 (1). The Malaysian legal system consists of two court systems, the Syariah courts and civil courts. While the Syariah courts serve as an essential institution for Muslims and maintain the Islamic identity of the nation, issues of jurisdiction can arise, particularly in interfaith cases. This study explores Malaysia's Universal Periodic Review of religious freedom and analyses jurisdictional conflicts through interviews with national law experts. After carefully considering Malaysia's unique historical and socioeconomic context, it is concluded that upholding the Federal Constitution is of utmost importance and implementing UPR recommendations should be separate from it.","PeriodicalId":247188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Studies & International Affairs","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Studies & International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/sinergi.0301.2023.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Malaysia, the Federal Constitution provides significant legal protections for religious freedom. Article 11 guarantees the right to practice and propagate one's religious beliefs freely, except for restrictions on propagation concerning Muslims under federal law. Furthermore, Islam holds a unique position in the country, according to Article 3 (1). The Malaysian legal system consists of two court systems, the Syariah courts and civil courts. While the Syariah courts serve as an essential institution for Muslims and maintain the Islamic identity of the nation, issues of jurisdiction can arise, particularly in interfaith cases. This study explores Malaysia's Universal Periodic Review of religious freedom and analyses jurisdictional conflicts through interviews with national law experts. After carefully considering Malaysia's unique historical and socioeconomic context, it is concluded that upholding the Federal Constitution is of utmost importance and implementing UPR recommendations should be separate from it.
马来西亚的宗教自由权利与管辖权冲突
在马来西亚,《联邦宪法》为宗教自由提供了重要的法律保护。第11条保障自由实践和宣传宗教信仰的权利,但联邦法律对宣传有关穆斯林的限制除外。此外,根据第3(1)条,伊斯兰教在该国拥有独特的地位。马来西亚的法律体系由两个法院系统组成,伊斯兰法院和民事法院。虽然伊斯兰法庭是穆斯林的一个重要机构,并维持了国家的伊斯兰身份,但也可能出现管辖权问题,特别是在不同宗教之间的案件中。本研究探讨了马来西亚对宗教自由的普遍定期审查,并通过与国家法律专家的访谈分析了司法冲突。在仔细考虑马来西亚独特的历史和社会经济背景后,结论是维护联邦宪法是最重要的,而实施普遍定期审议的建议应该与之分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信