News criteria on social media Comparing news media use of Facebook and Twitter

J. Jensen
{"title":"News criteria on social media Comparing news media use of Facebook and Twitter","authors":"J. Jensen","doi":"10.7146/JOURNALISTICA.V13I1.113667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The supply of news is larger than ever. However, traditional mass media are no longer in a privileged position as the exclusive gatekeepers of news; they face competition from alternative media, organizations and citizens who can produce and distribute news instantly through websites, blogs and social media. Furthermore, a significant share of news consumption is now based on links and stories appearing in users’ social media newsfeed. Every week, 56 percent of Danish citizens get news through social media that have become a major battleground for attention, clicks, viewers and readers (Schrøder et al. 2018). If traditional media are to retain attention and audience they have to play by social media logics.This article identifies and compares news criteria of social media posts shared on 25 Danish Twitter accounts and 25 Danish Facebook pages, representing exactly the same 25 news media actors. Hereby I investigate the criteria by which media frame their stories shared through social media and compare different uses and strategies on Facebook and Twitter.","PeriodicalId":326437,"journal":{"name":"Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistik","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalistica - Tidsskrift for forskning i journalistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/JOURNALISTICA.V13I1.113667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The supply of news is larger than ever. However, traditional mass media are no longer in a privileged position as the exclusive gatekeepers of news; they face competition from alternative media, organizations and citizens who can produce and distribute news instantly through websites, blogs and social media. Furthermore, a significant share of news consumption is now based on links and stories appearing in users’ social media newsfeed. Every week, 56 percent of Danish citizens get news through social media that have become a major battleground for attention, clicks, viewers and readers (Schrøder et al. 2018). If traditional media are to retain attention and audience they have to play by social media logics.This article identifies and compares news criteria of social media posts shared on 25 Danish Twitter accounts and 25 Danish Facebook pages, representing exactly the same 25 news media actors. Hereby I investigate the criteria by which media frame their stories shared through social media and compare different uses and strategies on Facebook and Twitter.
比较新闻媒体对Facebook和Twitter的使用
新闻的供应比以往任何时候都要多。然而,传统的大众媒体不再处于新闻独家守门人的特权地位;他们面临着来自其他媒体、组织和公民的竞争,后者可以通过网站、博客和社交媒体即时制作和传播新闻。此外,新闻消费的很大一部分现在是基于用户社交媒体新闻提要中的链接和故事。每周,56%的丹麦公民通过社交媒体获取新闻,社交媒体已成为吸引注意力、点击量、观众和读者的主要战场(Schrøder et al. 2018)。如果传统媒体想要留住注意力和受众,他们就必须按照社交媒体的逻辑行事。本文确定并比较了25个丹麦Twitter账户和25个丹麦Facebook页面上分享的社交媒体帖子的新闻标准,代表了完全相同的25个新闻媒体演员。在此,我研究了媒体通过社交媒体分享故事的标准,并比较了Facebook和Twitter的不同用途和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信