Ceftriaxone vs. norfloxacin in the treatment of resistant typhoid fever in 60 children

Youwei Huai, Qirong Zhu
{"title":"Ceftriaxone vs. norfloxacin in the treatment of resistant typhoid fever in 60 children","authors":"Youwei Huai, Qirong Zhu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0578-1310.2000.06.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the effect of ceftriaxone and norfloxacin on resistant typhoid fever in children. \n \n \nMethods \nSixty children with typhoid fever resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin or cotrimoxazole were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cases received ceftriaxone [100 mg/ (kg·d) , once daily, iv] and the other 30 received norfloxacin [10 mg/ (kg·d) , twice daily] . \n \n \nResult \nCeftriaxone was effective in 93% of the 30 cases, while norfloxacin was effective in 80% of the 30 cases (Ridit analysis, ceftriaxon (R = 0.421 1, norfloxacin (R = 0.578 9, u = 2.12, P <0.05) . \n \n \nConclusion \nThe therapeutic effect of ceftriaxone on drug-resistant typhoid fever in children was better than that of norfloxacin. \n \n \nKey words: \nTyphoid; Ceftriaxone; Norfloxacin; Child","PeriodicalId":416525,"journal":{"name":"Chinexe Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinexe Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0578-1310.2000.06.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect of ceftriaxone and norfloxacin on resistant typhoid fever in children. Methods Sixty children with typhoid fever resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin or cotrimoxazole were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cases received ceftriaxone [100 mg/ (kg·d) , once daily, iv] and the other 30 received norfloxacin [10 mg/ (kg·d) , twice daily] . Result Ceftriaxone was effective in 93% of the 30 cases, while norfloxacin was effective in 80% of the 30 cases (Ridit analysis, ceftriaxon (R = 0.421 1, norfloxacin (R = 0.578 9, u = 2.12, P <0.05) . Conclusion The therapeutic effect of ceftriaxone on drug-resistant typhoid fever in children was better than that of norfloxacin. Key words: Typhoid; Ceftriaxone; Norfloxacin; Child
头孢曲松与诺氟沙星治疗儿童耐药伤寒60例比较
目的比较头孢曲松与诺氟沙星治疗儿童耐药伤寒的疗效。方法将60例对氯霉素、氨苄西林、复方新诺明耐药的伤寒患儿随机分为两组。30例给予头孢曲松[100 mg/ (kg·d),每日1次,静脉注射],30例给予诺氟沙星[10 mg/ (kg·d),每日2次]。结果30例患者中头孢曲松有效率为93%,诺氟沙星有效率为80% (Ridit分析,头孢曲松(R = 0.421 1),诺氟沙星(R = 0.578 9, u = 2.12, P <0.05)。结论头孢曲松治疗儿童耐药伤寒的疗效优于诺氟沙星。关键词:伤寒;头孢曲松钠;诺氟沙星;孩子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信