Emergency Severity Index Scores Differ by Health Provider’s Gender andPatient’s Age

J. Vigil, Joe Alcock, Patrick Coulombe, Chance R. Strenth
{"title":"Emergency Severity Index Scores Differ by Health Provider’s Gender andPatient’s Age","authors":"J. Vigil, Joe Alcock, Patrick Coulombe, Chance R. Strenth","doi":"10.2174/1874321801509010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Experimental research shows that laywomen express higher levels of empathy than men to pain suffering behaviors in others and female practitioners interact with and may prescribe different levels of pain medication to patients than male practitioners. Objectives: In this study we conduct a small medical records review to examine the possibility that female emergency department nurses assign lower levels (i.e., more urgent, serious, resource extensive) of emergency severity index (ESI) scores of patients presenting for care in the emergency department than male nurses, raising the possibility that patients receive disparate treatment during triage depending on the gender of medical staff. Methods: The patient-provided pain scores and the examiner-determined ESI scores of forty-eight male, emergency de- partment patients (21-89yrs, Mage = 57.2, SDage = 19.3) were examined across multiple visits, along with the gender of their triage examiner at each visit of (127 total patient/provider interactions). Results: A cross-classified mixed-effects model to analyze the influence of examiner gender on the triage scores that showed a significant Examiner Gender x Patient Age interaction. Further probing showed that female practitioners ascribed significantly lower ESI scores than male practitioners, although this effect was limited to patients younger than 55 years of age. Conclusion: These findings warrant larger-scale investigations of patient and examiner influences on patient treatment, which are necessary for creating more standardized protocols for reliably assessing emergency-care patients and for reducing health disparities in patient treatment quality.","PeriodicalId":272376,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874321801509010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Experimental research shows that laywomen express higher levels of empathy than men to pain suffering behaviors in others and female practitioners interact with and may prescribe different levels of pain medication to patients than male practitioners. Objectives: In this study we conduct a small medical records review to examine the possibility that female emergency department nurses assign lower levels (i.e., more urgent, serious, resource extensive) of emergency severity index (ESI) scores of patients presenting for care in the emergency department than male nurses, raising the possibility that patients receive disparate treatment during triage depending on the gender of medical staff. Methods: The patient-provided pain scores and the examiner-determined ESI scores of forty-eight male, emergency de- partment patients (21-89yrs, Mage = 57.2, SDage = 19.3) were examined across multiple visits, along with the gender of their triage examiner at each visit of (127 total patient/provider interactions). Results: A cross-classified mixed-effects model to analyze the influence of examiner gender on the triage scores that showed a significant Examiner Gender x Patient Age interaction. Further probing showed that female practitioners ascribed significantly lower ESI scores than male practitioners, although this effect was limited to patients younger than 55 years of age. Conclusion: These findings warrant larger-scale investigations of patient and examiner influences on patient treatment, which are necessary for creating more standardized protocols for reliably assessing emergency-care patients and for reducing health disparities in patient treatment quality.
急诊严重程度指数得分因医疗服务提供者的性别和患者的年龄而异
背景:实验研究表明,外行女性对他人痛苦行为的共情水平高于男性,女性从业者与患者的互动以及给患者开的止痛药水平可能不同于男性从业者。目的:在本研究中,我们进行了一项小型的医疗记录回顾,以检验女性急诊科护士在急诊科就诊的患者中分配较低水平(即更紧急、更严重、资源更广泛)急诊严重程度指数(ESI)分数的可能性,这增加了患者在分诊时接受不同治疗的可能性,这取决于医务人员的性别。方法:对48名男性急诊科患者(21-89岁,Mage = 57.2, SDage = 19.3)的患者提供的疼痛评分和审查员确定的ESI评分进行多次就诊检查,并在每次就诊时检查其分诊审查员的性别(127例患者/提供者互动)。结果:采用交叉分类混合效应模型分析审查员性别对分诊评分的影响,结果显示审查员性别与患者年龄之间存在显著的交互作用。进一步的研究表明,女性从业者的ESI得分明显低于男性从业者,尽管这种影响仅限于年龄小于55岁的患者。结论:这些发现需要对患者和审查员对患者治疗的影响进行更大规模的调查,这对于创建更标准化的方案以可靠地评估急诊患者和减少患者治疗质量的健康差异是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信