Problems of legal regulation of control measures over employees

Igor Kravchenko
{"title":"Problems of legal regulation of control measures over employees","authors":"Igor Kravchenko","doi":"10.56215/04212202.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyses the statutory provisions of national and European legislation, the practice of the ECHR and national courts in protecting employees' right to privacy in the performance of labour functions. The problem of preserving the “private autonomy” of employees when the employer exercises control over the performance of such functions using technical means and methods is investigated. The need for a normative definition of the limits of restrictions on workers' rights and freedoms in the context of such control has been argued. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the expediency of normative consolidation in the national legislation of certain guarantees for employees in the event of interference of the employer's economic (disciplinary) authorities in the sphere of their private autonomy during the use of technical means. The scientific originality of the study is conditioned by the fact that the issue of the legality of wiretapping telephone conversations, control over electronic correspondence and communication of employees in social networks during the performance of their work functions is part of a set of publications on the limits of employer intervention using technical means in the private life of employees. The subject of the study shows the relevance of the regulatory definition of private autonomy of employees and its boundaries by national legislation regarding legal guarantees against employer encroachments. Protection of the rights of employees during the performance of their work functions from interference by the disciplinary authorities of the employer in the sphere of their private autonomy, surveillance of communication in electronic information networks, the content of telephone conversations, electronic, and other correspondence cannot be effective without a regulatory definition of the permissible limits of such interference in the private life of employees","PeriodicalId":334836,"journal":{"name":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/04212202.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study analyses the statutory provisions of national and European legislation, the practice of the ECHR and national courts in protecting employees' right to privacy in the performance of labour functions. The problem of preserving the “private autonomy” of employees when the employer exercises control over the performance of such functions using technical means and methods is investigated. The need for a normative definition of the limits of restrictions on workers' rights and freedoms in the context of such control has been argued. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the expediency of normative consolidation in the national legislation of certain guarantees for employees in the event of interference of the employer's economic (disciplinary) authorities in the sphere of their private autonomy during the use of technical means. The scientific originality of the study is conditioned by the fact that the issue of the legality of wiretapping telephone conversations, control over electronic correspondence and communication of employees in social networks during the performance of their work functions is part of a set of publications on the limits of employer intervention using technical means in the private life of employees. The subject of the study shows the relevance of the regulatory definition of private autonomy of employees and its boundaries by national legislation regarding legal guarantees against employer encroachments. Protection of the rights of employees during the performance of their work functions from interference by the disciplinary authorities of the employer in the sphere of their private autonomy, surveillance of communication in electronic information networks, the content of telephone conversations, electronic, and other correspondence cannot be effective without a regulatory definition of the permissible limits of such interference in the private life of employees
对员工控制措施的法律规制问题
该研究分析了各国和欧洲立法的法定规定、《欧洲人权公约》和各国法院在保护雇员履行劳动职能时的隐私权方面的做法。在雇主利用技术手段和方法控制雇员履行这些职能时,保留雇员“私人自主权”的问题进行了研究。有人认为,在这种控制的情况下,有必要对限制工人权利和自由的限度作出规范的定义。这项研究的目的是证明,在雇主的经济(纪律)当局在使用技术手段期间干涉雇员的私人自主权的情况下,在国家立法中巩固对雇员的某些保障的规范性是便利的。这项研究的科学原创性取决于这样一个事实,即窃听电话谈话、控制电子通信和雇员在履行其工作职能期间在社交网络上的通信的合法性问题,是一系列关于雇主使用技术手段干预雇员私人生活的限制的出版物的一部分。本研究的主题表明,雇员私人自主权的监管定义及其边界与有关防止雇主侵犯的法律保障的国家立法的相关性。保护雇员在履行其工作职能期间不受雇主纪律当局在其私人自治领域、对电子信息网络通信、电话交谈内容、电子通信和其他通信内容的监视的权利,如果没有对这种对雇员私人生活的干预的允许限度的监管定义,就不可能有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信