Truth, Error and Principle: Anti-Catholicism in Presbyterian Dissent

Ryan Mallon
{"title":"Truth, Error and Principle: Anti-Catholicism in Presbyterian Dissent","authors":"Ryan Mallon","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474482790.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines the dissenting churches’ reaction to the Maynooth controversy, the restoration of the Roman Catholic hierarchy in England during the so-called ‘papal aggression’, and the anti-popery movement that dominated British public discourse in the late 1840s and 1850s. While the Maynooth controversy and the papal aggression appeared to offer a shared common enemy against which Scotland’s dissenters could unite, the chapter will question how far this dissenting co-operation moved beyond simple anti-popery and allowed for a dissenting and anti-erastian vision of Protestantism to emerge within the churches. It assesses how far a united dissenting effort against popery and Maynooth in particular was able to be maintained despite differences in principle and approach. It also questions whether dissenting unity in the anti-popery movement of the mid-nineteenth century was based simply on a narrow opposition to Roman Catholicism or a more positive assertion of Protestant dissenting identity. The chapter concludes by examining how this period of militant anti-popery impacted the churches’ perceptions of themselves, and how the 1860 tercentenary of the Scottish Reformation emphasised, despite the common ground achieved, their competing claims to Scotland’s Protestant heritage and nationality.","PeriodicalId":227963,"journal":{"name":"Dissent After Disruption","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissent After Disruption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474482790.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter outlines the dissenting churches’ reaction to the Maynooth controversy, the restoration of the Roman Catholic hierarchy in England during the so-called ‘papal aggression’, and the anti-popery movement that dominated British public discourse in the late 1840s and 1850s. While the Maynooth controversy and the papal aggression appeared to offer a shared common enemy against which Scotland’s dissenters could unite, the chapter will question how far this dissenting co-operation moved beyond simple anti-popery and allowed for a dissenting and anti-erastian vision of Protestantism to emerge within the churches. It assesses how far a united dissenting effort against popery and Maynooth in particular was able to be maintained despite differences in principle and approach. It also questions whether dissenting unity in the anti-popery movement of the mid-nineteenth century was based simply on a narrow opposition to Roman Catholicism or a more positive assertion of Protestant dissenting identity. The chapter concludes by examining how this period of militant anti-popery impacted the churches’ perceptions of themselves, and how the 1860 tercentenary of the Scottish Reformation emphasised, despite the common ground achieved, their competing claims to Scotland’s Protestant heritage and nationality.
真理、错误与原则:长老会异议中的反天主教
本章概述了不同教会对梅努斯争议的反应,在所谓的“教皇侵略”期间,罗马天主教等级制度在英格兰的恢复,以及19世纪40年代末和50年代主导英国公共话语的反教皇运动。尽管梅努斯的争议和教皇的侵略似乎为苏格兰的异见者提供了一个共同的敌人,让他们可以团结起来反对,但本章将质疑这种异见合作在多大程度上超越了简单的反教皇制,并允许新教异见和反抹除的愿景在教会中出现。它评估了尽管在原则和方法上存在差异,但反对天主教和梅努斯的统一努力能够维持到什么程度。它还质疑,19世纪中期反教皇运动中持不同政见者的团结是否仅仅基于对罗马天主教的狭隘反对,还是更积极地主张新教持不同政见者的身份。本章最后考察了这段激进的反教皇时期是如何影响教会对自己的看法的,以及1860年苏格兰宗教改革三百周年是如何强调的,尽管达成了共识,他们对苏格兰新教遗产和国籍的竞争要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信