LEADING CHANGES IN ASSESSMENT USING AN EVIDENCE BASED APPROACH

J. Macaulay, C. Speed, A. Dimitropoulos, C. Simpson
{"title":"LEADING CHANGES IN ASSESSMENT USING AN EVIDENCE BASED APPROACH","authors":"J. Macaulay, C. Speed, A. Dimitropoulos, C. Simpson","doi":"10.16923/REB.V13I2.582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives It is has been widely accepted that assessment of learning is a critical component of education and that assessment drives/guides student learning through shaping study habits and student approaches to learning. However, although most academics would agree that assessment is a critical aspect of their roles as teachers it is often an aspect of teaching that is regarded more as an additional task rather than an integral component of the teaching/learning continuum. An additional impediment to high quality assessment is the non-evidence based-approach to the decision making process. The overall aim of this project was to improve the quality of assessment in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology undergraduate education by promoting high quality assessment. Materials and methods To do this we developed and trialled an audit tool for mapping assessment practices. The audit tool was designed to gather data on current assessment practices and identify areas of good practice in which assessment aligned with the learning objectives and areas in need of improvement. This evidence base will then be used to drive change in assessment. Results and conclusions Using the assessment mapping tool we have mapped the assessment regime in a Biochemistry and Molecular Biology major at Monash University. Criteria used included: assessment type, format, timing, assessors, provision of feedback, level of learning (Bloom’s), approaches taken to planning assessment. We have mapped assessment of content and the systematic development of higher order learning and skills progression throughout the program of study. The data has enabled us to examine the assessment at unit (course) level as well as the vertical development across the major. This information is now being used to inform a review of the units and the major.","PeriodicalId":185758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biochemistry Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biochemistry Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16923/REB.V13I2.582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives It is has been widely accepted that assessment of learning is a critical component of education and that assessment drives/guides student learning through shaping study habits and student approaches to learning. However, although most academics would agree that assessment is a critical aspect of their roles as teachers it is often an aspect of teaching that is regarded more as an additional task rather than an integral component of the teaching/learning continuum. An additional impediment to high quality assessment is the non-evidence based-approach to the decision making process. The overall aim of this project was to improve the quality of assessment in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology undergraduate education by promoting high quality assessment. Materials and methods To do this we developed and trialled an audit tool for mapping assessment practices. The audit tool was designed to gather data on current assessment practices and identify areas of good practice in which assessment aligned with the learning objectives and areas in need of improvement. This evidence base will then be used to drive change in assessment. Results and conclusions Using the assessment mapping tool we have mapped the assessment regime in a Biochemistry and Molecular Biology major at Monash University. Criteria used included: assessment type, format, timing, assessors, provision of feedback, level of learning (Bloom’s), approaches taken to planning assessment. We have mapped assessment of content and the systematic development of higher order learning and skills progression throughout the program of study. The data has enabled us to examine the assessment at unit (course) level as well as the vertical development across the major. This information is now being used to inform a review of the units and the major.
使用基于证据的方法领导评估的变化
学习评估是教育的一个重要组成部分,并且通过塑造学习习惯和学生的学习方法来驱动/指导学生的学习,这一点已被广泛接受。然而,尽管大多数学者都同意评估是他们作为教师角色的一个关键方面,但它往往是教学的一个方面,更多地被视为一项额外的任务,而不是教学/学习连续体的一个组成部分。对高质量评估的另一个障碍是对决策过程采用非基于证据的方法。本项目旨在通过推动高质量的评估,提高生物化学与分子生物学本科教育的评估质量。材料和方法为此,我们开发并试用了一种审计工具,用于绘制评估实践。该审计工具旨在收集有关当前评估实践的数据,并确定评估与学习目标一致的良好实践领域和需要改进的领域。然后,这个证据基础将用于推动评估中的变化。结果和结论使用评估绘图工具,我们绘制了莫纳什大学生物化学和分子生物学专业的评估制度。使用的标准包括:评估类型、格式、时间、评估者、反馈的提供、学习水平(Bloom’s)、计划评估的方法。我们在整个学习计划中绘制了内容评估和高阶学习和技能进步的系统发展。这些数据使我们能够检查单元(课程)水平的评估以及跨专业的垂直发展。目前正在利用这些资料对各单位和少校进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信